Biosynthesis of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles Using Bacillus thermotolerans and Their Antimicrobial Potential Against Multidrug-Resistant Klebsiella Pneumoniae

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Kufa, Najaf, Iraq

10.22052/JNS.2025.03.054

Abstract

Resistance to most antibiotics by pathogenic microbes has become a major international problem, making it necessary to find effective treatments. These resistant diseases must be stopped by effective microorganisms. A strong isolate (N11) was chosen from 30 probiotic strains screened for antibacterial activity. Bacillus thermotolerans was identified by appearance, microscopic inspection, and DNA sequencing of isolate N11. This study examined B. thermotolerans’ iron oxide nanoparticle production. Their MDR action against Klebsiella pnemoniae from diabetic foot infections was examined. Morphological, biochemical, and VITEK2 systems revealed MDR Klebsiella pnemoniae isolates. UV-Vis spectrophotometry, FTIR, FSEM, AFM, and XRD confirmed IONP biosynthesis. IONPs from B. thermotolerans were effective against MDR Klebsiella pnemoniae. FSEM analysis showed particle sizes of 25.31–64.25 nm, averaging 42 nm. AFM measured 7.677 nm particle size, and XRD measured 20 nm. Antibacterial tests revealed a maximum inhibition zone of 31 mm at 500 µg/mL against Klebsiella pneumoniae. Additionally, the IONPs exhibited antibiofilm activity with the highest recorded biofilm inhibition of 97.50% at 1000 µg/mL, while no haemolysis activities in all concentrations. These findings confirm the effectiveness of biosynthesized IONPs as a potential therapeutic agent for treating antimicrobial resistance in MDR pathogens.

Keywords


INTRODUCTION
Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU) is one of the most significant diabetic complications with serious consequences. Improper management of DFU can lead to osteoporosis, gangrene, and amputation. For amputees, the risk of mortality increases, and survivors are more susceptible to microbial resistance. There is an increasing struggle over selecting the most effective antibiotic(s) for DFU. Factors associated with mortality in patients with DFU, as well as antimicrobial resistance in affected individuals, remain critical research priorities [1,2]. Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has existed since the discovery of the first antibiotic, “penicillin,” in 1940, as part of bacteria’s natural evolutionary process. Genes for resistance existed in healthy bacterial species millions of years ago. However, AMR has now become a significant global health concern, largely due to the irrational overuse and abuse of antibiotics, which leads to prolonged hospital stays, economic strain, and even fatal outcomes [3-6].
Antibiotic resistance is one of the most critical public health threats worldwide. It is estimated to cause 700,000 deaths annually and may rise to 10 million deaths per year by 2050 [7,8]. In the United States alone, at least 2 million people annually become infected with antibiotic-resistant microorganisms, resulting in at least 23,000 deaths [9]. The impact of AMR is disproportionately higher in poorer countries with underdeveloped healthcare systems [10-12]. In recent years, antibiotic consumption has continued to rise in many low- and middle-income countries [13,14]. Even when antibiotics are used correctly, their overuse can still lead to resistance. This creates an urgent need to develop innovative strategies and technologies to combat microbial resistance [15-22].
Nanotechnology offers promising solutions to global challenges, including AMR. Its advanced techniques can support many biomedical applications including drug and vaccine delivery [23,24], antibacterial activity [25-33], cancer treatment [34-37], development of nanoparticles with antioxidant properties [38-41], and even modifying nanostructures for specific applications [43-46]. Nanoparticles exhibit unique electrical, catalytic, magnetic, and optical properties that differ from bulk materials [47-49]. For example, metallic nanoparticles like gold, silver, platinum, and palladium, as well as inorganic oxides like zinc oxide and titanium oxide, are valued for their exceptional mechanical, chemical, and magnetic properties [50-53]. Recently, Artificial Intelligence (AI) has emerged as a transformative tool in advancing nanotechnology, enabling more precise design, synthesis, and analysis of nanomaterials [54]. Biological methods for synthesizing nanoparticles are increasingly favored due to their environmentally friendly, non-toxic nature and, in some cases, superior efficacy against microorganisms. Unlike physical and chemical methods, which are energy-intensive, costly, and potentially hazardous to the environment, biological synthesis offers a sustainable alternative [55-57]. 
Iron oxide nanoparticles (IONPs) have gained widespread recognition for their exceptional magnetic, chemical, and biocompatible characteristics, making them highly valuable in both biomedical and environmental applications. Their utility spans various fields, including targeted drug delivery, magnetic resonance imaging, and antimicrobial therapies [58-61]. The development of IONPs through biologically derived and environmentally sustainable methods presents a promising alternative to traditional chemical synthesis, offering enhanced safety and efficiency. This study aims to explore the biosynthesis of iron oxide nanoparticles using Bacillus thermotolerans and assess their potential as inhibitors of multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from diabetic foot infections. Through advanced characterization methods, the research seeks to uncover the therapeutic potential of IONPs in addressing the global challenge of antimicrobial resistance.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Isolated and Identification of bacteria from a diabetic foot infection
A total of 75 swab samples were collected from patients with multidrug-resistant (MDR) diabetic foot disease from three hospitals in Hilla province (Marjan Hospital and the diabetic foot center in Alsadeq Hospital) between October 2023 and January 2024. Among these, Klebsiella pneumoniae was the predominant and most common Gram-negative bacilli, by 40 isolates (53%), followed by Staphylococcus aureus (15 isolates, 20%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (9 isolates, 13%), Escherichia coli (5 isolates, 7%), Proteus mirabilis (3 isolates, 4%), and other species (3 isolates, 4%). Swabs from patients with diabetic foot infections were transported to the laboratory, where they were cultured by streaking on blood agar and MacConkey agar. In this study, the MDR isolates were identified based on their morphological properties, biochemical tests, and results obtained from the VITEK2 system [62].

 

Bacterial Isolates Used to Synthesize Nanoparticles
Different bacterial isolates from soil were tested (N1-N30); bacterial isolate no. N11 was selected based on color change and biological activity by growing on brain heart infusion agar at 37°C for 24-48 h. Colony morphology of differentiated-on medium and basic biochemical tests, molecular examination through gene expression through the extraction of genomic DNA, DNA sequencing assay, and agarose gel electrophoresis [63].

 

Synthesis of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles by N11 (Bacillus thermotolerans) 
Isolate no. N11 were cultured in brain heart infusion broth at 37°C for 24 hours. After incubation, iron (ferric chloride, FeCl₃, 0.0081 mg) was added, followed by incubation for another 24 hours at 37°C in a shaking incubator at 150 rpm as shown in Fig. 1. The resulting colloidal suspension was centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 15 minutes, and the supernatant was precipitated and used as a mechanical iron oxide nanoparticle (IONPs) suspension for separation [64,65].

 

Detection of Biosynthesis Iron Oxide Nanoparticles
The synthesis of IONPS of nanosize with a brown shade is proven in Fig. 1. The structural properties of the prepared nanoparticles were characterized by UV, FESEM, AFM, XRD, and FTIR evaluations [66], and analyses of these NPs were conducted at the University of Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran.


Antibacterial Activity of Iron Oxide NPs
The antibacterial activity of IONPs was examined using an agar diffusion methods [67,68] against multi-drug-resistant (MDR) Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteria isolated from diabetic foot infections. Four pure isolated colonies of fresh culture were suspended in five milliliters of brain heart infusion broth and incubated at 37°C for four to eight hours. The turbidity produced by the growth culture was calibrated with sterile broth to achieve an optical density comparable to the 0.5 McFarland requirements (equivalent to 1.5 x 10⁸ cells/mL). A sterile cotton swab was dipped into the suspension, and used to streak the entire surface of a Mueller Hinton agar (MHA) dishes. The wells in MHA are prepared using a sterile cork borer (7 mm diameter of pores), and filled with 100 µl of IONPs of 1000 µg/ml, 500 µg/ml, 250 µg/ml, and 125 µg/ml compared with well filled by Distilled water as control. The dishes are incubated at 37°C for twenty- four hours after the incubation period, the diameter of the inhibition zones in millimetres was measured to determine antimicrobial activity.

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Formation of iron oxide nanoparticles by color change as shown in Fig. 1, and their size estimation within the composite suspension that was confirmed by UV-visible spectroscopy as shown in Fig. 2. The absorption spectrum of nanoparticles produced in the reaction mixture peaks at 280 nm, possibly due to the oxidation of zero-valent iron to iron oxide nanoparticles. The spectra clearly show maximum absorption peaks, indicating the formation of an increased number of iron oxide nanoparticles in the solution. The absorption peaks at wavelengths of 204 nm and 320 nm further indicate the formation of iron oxide nanoparticles [69,70].
The field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) was used to determine the surface morphology and scale of nanoparticles in composite films [ 71]. The specimen was prepared by grinding iron oxide nanoparticles, preparing a colloidal suspension of the nanoparticles, and attaching a droplet of the suspension to the fixing matrix. Before FESEM characterization and after FESEM characterization, the samples were again air-dried and stored in a drying chamber. Images were carried out in low vacuum mode at an accelerating voltage of 10-12 kV, at different magnification forces. Bacillus thermotolerans particles with sizes in the range of 25.31–64.25 nm, with an average size of 42 nm, were observed, as shown in Fig. 3. FESEM analysis showed the average particle size and detected their structure. However, large nanoparticles were seen due to aggregation, which may be due to the presence of cell components on the surface of nanoparticles acting as a capping agent [72]. The nanoparticles were not in direct contact, even within the aggregates, indicating the stabilization of the nanoparticles by a capping agent [73].
Fig. 4 shows that the atomic force microscope was used to investigate the dispersion and aggregation of nanomaterials, as well as their shape and size. (AFM; XE100 Park systems) at a scanning range of 10 x 10 µm finally formed an agglomeration with a large size of IONPS particle about 7.677 nm from B. thermotolerans. Atomic Force Microscopy’s extraordinary resolution allows for precise three-dimensional visualization of molecular structures, as well as atomic-scale strategies. The procedure for preparing samples for AFM is straightforward. Because samples can be viewed under near-physiological conditions, AFM can record the critical procedures of molecules, organelles, and other structures in living cells in real-time [74,75].
The biogenic iron oxide nanoparticles were analyzed using X-ray diffraction (XRD) [76]. XRD is a common analytical technique. The 2θ peak position was correctly marked using JCPDS NO: 01-076-1363 to analyze the molecular crystal structure and identify qualitatively different molecules. Quantitative chemical analysis was used to calculate crystallinity, symmetrical substitution, and particle size. The crystal size was estimated using the Debye-Scherrer formula: D = 0.94γ/β cosθ. The diameter of the nanoparticles was determined to be 20 nm for Bacillus thermotolerans, as shown in Figure 5.
Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) was used to evaluate the iron oxide powder supplied from Sigma Aldrich (USA) for the sample in the Bacillus thermotolerans group, as shown in Fig. 6. The FTIR spectrum of the oxide chain ranged between 500 and 4000 cm⁻¹, and the absorption peak was observed at 165557 cm⁻¹ in Bacillus thermotolerans. This was defined by group frequencies, the alcoholic (alcohol) ligand of the carbonyl C=O in the asymmetric stretching of the carbonate ion (CO₃²⁻ species). OH group stretching and bending vibrations were assigned to the stages of the (CO₃²⁻)-water interaction. The FT-IR spectrum of IONPS synthesized by bacteria showed a band between 500 and 800 cm⁻¹, associated with the chain oxide. The peak at 165557 cm⁻¹ was assigned to the O-H stretch [77, 78].
Genomic DNA of Bacillus thermotolerans was isolated and then electrophoresed on an agarose gel, and documented visually. The DNA samples were used as templates for the PCR reaction aimed at amplifying the 16S rDNA gene (universal primers), 27F: AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCA and 1492R: GGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT [79]. Electrophoresis was performed with the PCR product 1470bp in agarose gel, which was then visualized. 
Sequences of B. thermotolerans were obtained online and aligned to the NCBI database using BLAST software. Matching numbers were identified using BioEdit software, and the sequences were submitted to NCBI in FASTA format using Sequin software. Pairwise alignment and distance phylogeny were investigated for the Bacillus thermotolerans 16S rRNA gene sequences. The online NCBI BLAST software compared the resulting sequences.
The antibacterial activities of iron oxide NPs as shown in Fig. 7 and Table 1 against multi-drug-resistant (MDR) Klebsiella bacteria isolated from diabetic foot infections. The effect of the nanoparticles on Klebsiella pnemoniae (1-4) and Klebsiella oxytoca (5) appears great effect in all concentrations.
Klebsiella pnemoniae exposed to nanoparticles at a concentration of 1000 µg/mL. Gram-negative bacteria were more sensitive to biogenic iron NPs and this align with [70]. The antibacterial action against many bacteria, including Gram-negative, aerobic, and anaerobic organisms, has been demonstrated. Because these materials have no harmful impact on humans, they are considered excellent antibiotic substitutes [80-82]. Many studies showed antibacterial activity of different nanoparticles against microorganisms such as titanium nanoparticles[83] and silver nanoparticles [84].
Fig. 8 illustrates the development of synthetic IONPS with ant biofilm activity against Klebsiella pnemoniae. The antibiofilm effect is proportional to nanoparticle size [85]. The highest recorded anti-biofilm activity was observed with 97.50%. at 1000 µg/mL of IONPS against Klebsiella pnemoniae, although the lowest activity observed with 48.90% at 125 µg/mL of IONPS. These finding align with those studies demonstrating that the toxicity and bactericidal effects depends on concentration, species, and particle size [86]. These results match those of research showing that particle size, species, and concentration define the toxicity and bactericidal properties [86]. These can be explained by the size of the nanoparticles since they can reach into the biofilm matrix really deeply. Furthermore, these nano-agents have a high surface area to volume ratio, which facilitates efficient interaction with bacteria [87].
The radical scavenging assay was modified to determine the antioxidant effect of iron oxide NPs metabolites by reducing DPPH free radicals as shown in Fig. 9. The absorbance at 517 nm was measured 30 minutes after incubation of the nanoparticles in the DPPH solution at concentrations of 1000, 500, 250, and 125 μg/mL. The ability of nanoparticles to scavenge DPPH free radicals was validated by the color change measure-up [88,89]. 
The NPs synthesized by Bacillus thermotolerans showed scavenging percentages of 86.665% at 1000 µg/mL, 64.428% at 500 µg/mL, 61.840% at 250 µg/mL, and 60.505% at 125 µg/mL. Traditionally, the antioxidant radical scavenging potential of 1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl in vitro (DPPH) was considered to be a stable free radical, acting as a donor of hydrogen or an agent of electron absorption reduction. The antioxidant radical scavenging capacities of 1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl were also calculated in vitro, as it is a strong and well-known free radical, reliant on decreasing donor hydrogen or electron absorption [90]. Moreover, the antioxidant qualities of these nanoparticles help to explain their efficiency since oxidative stress is fundamental in immune resistance systems and bacterial pathogenicity [91]. 
Table 2 presents information on hemolysis, a condition in which red blood cells (RBCs) rupture and release their components, causing anemia, jaundice, and renal disease [92]. Because all substances entering the bloodstream interact with RBCs upon contact, it is important to evaluate the hemolytic properties of the materials. These finding highlights the biological applicability of nontoxic iron oxide NPs and these align with [93].

 

CONCLUSION 
This study successfully demonstrated the biosynthesis of iron oxide nanoparticles (IONPs) using Bacillus thermotolerans and evaluated their antimicrobial potential against multidrug-resistant (MDR) Klebsiella pneumonia. Characterization techniques confirmed the formation of IONPs with nanoscale morphology, exhibiting significant antibacterial activity and biofilm inhibition. Unlike conventional antibiotics, these nanoparticles employ a dual-action mechanism by disrupting both planktonic bacterial growth and biofilm integrity, making them a promising alternative for combating antibiotic resistance. IONPs’ non-hemolytic character suggests their possible safety for biological uses. Future research should explore their in vivo applications, long-term stability, and interactions with biological systems to advance their clinical and biomedical use.

 

CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this manuscript.

 

REFERENCE
1. Shaheen MM, Al Dahab S, Abu Fada M, Idieis R. Isolation and characterization of bacteria from diabetic foot ulcer: amputation, antibiotic resistance and mortality rate. International Journal of Diabetes in Developing Countries. 2021 Sep 10:1-9.
2. Al-Muhanna SG, Banoon SR, Al-Kraety IA. Molecular detection of integron class 1 gene in proteus mirabilis isolated from diabetic foot infections. Plant Arch. 2020 Apr 1;2(1):3101-3107.
3. Chaudhary NA, Munawar MD, Khan MT, Rehan K, Sadiq A, Bhatti HW, Rizvi ZA. Epidemiology, bacteriological profile, and antibiotic sensitivity pattern of burn wounds in the burn unit of a tertiary care hospital. Cureus. 2019 Jun 1;11(6).
4. AL-KRAETY IA, AL-MUHANNA SG, BANOON SR, GHASEMIAN A. Bacterial vaginosis pattern and antibiotic susceptibility testing in female patients using high vaginal swabs. Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity. 2022 Jun 2;23(6).
5. Al-Kraety IA, Al-Muhanna SG, Banoon SR. Molecular Exploring of Plasmid-mediated Ampc beta Lactamase Gene in Clinical Isolates of Proteus mirabilis. Rev Bionatura J. 2021;6(3).
6. Ali ZH, Aldujaili NH. Therapeutic activity of Bacillus subtilis against some multidrug resistance bacterial pathogens isolated from burn infections. InAIP Conference Proceedings 2022 Jan 11 (Vol. 2386, No. 1). AIP Publishing.
7. Dougan G, Dowson C, Overington J, Participants NG. Meeting the discovery challenge of drug-resistant infections: progress and focusing resources. Drug discovery today. 2019 Feb 1;24(2):452-461.
8. Banoon SR, Hussein Ali Z, Al-Kraety IA, Aziz ZS. Molecular Detection of blaTEM and blaCTX-M Encoding Genes from Klebsiella oxytoca Isolates from Tonsillitis. Iranian Journal of War and Public Health. 2023 Jan 10;15(1):101-105.
9. Richter MF, Hergenrother PJ. The challenge of converting Gram‐positive‐only compounds into broad‐spectrum antibiotics. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2019 Jan;1435(1):18-38.
10. McCloskey AP, Malabar L, McCabe PG, Gitsham A, Jarman I. Antibiotic prescribing trends in primary care 2014–2022. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy. 2023 Aug 1;19(8):1193-1201.
11. Mölstad S, Löfmark S, Carlin K, Erntell M, Aspevall O, Blad L, Hanberger H, Hedin K, Hellman J, Norman C, Skoog G. Lessons learnt during 20 years of the Swedish strategic programme against antibiotic resistance. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2017 Oct 3;95(11):764.
12. Banoon S, Ali Z, Salih T. Antibiotic resistance profile of local thermophilic Bacillus licheniformis isolated from Maysan province soil. Comunicata Scientiae. 2020 Jul 13;11:e3291.
13. Sartelli M, C. Hardcastle T, Catena F, Chichom-Mefire A, Coccolini F, Dhingra S, Haque M, Hodonou A, Iskandar K, Labricciosa FM, Marmorale C. Antibiotic use in low and middle-income countries and the challenges of antimicrobial resistance in surgery. Antibiotics. 2020 Aug 9;9(8):497.
14. Klein EY, Milkowska-Shibata M, Tseng KK, Sharland M, Gandra S, Pulcini C, Laxminarayan R. Assessment of WHO antibiotic consumption and access targets in 76 countries, 2000–15: an analysis of pharmaceutical sales data. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2021 Jan 1;21(1):107-115.
15. Hussein AN, FAWZI M, Obaid RF, Banoon SR, Abood ES, Ghasemian A. Dual pharmacological targeting of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) PKNA/PKNB: A novel approach for the selective treatment of TB illness. Egyptian Journal of Chemistry. 2022 Dec 1;65(12):409-419.
16. Muteeb G, Rehman MT, Shahwan M, Aatif M. Origin of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance, and their impacts on drug development: A narrative review. Pharmaceuticals. 2023 Nov 15;16(11):1615.
17. Murugaiyan J, Kumar PA, Rao GS, Iskandar K, Hawser S, Hays JP, Mohsen Y, Adukkadukkam S, Awuah WA, Jose RA, Sylvia N. Progress in alternative strategies to combat antimicrobial resistance: focus on antibiotics. Antibiotics. 2022 Feb 4;11(2):200.
18. Banoon ZR, Mahmood RS, Hamad AR, Hussein ZA. Design, microwave synthesis, characterization and antimicrobial activity of imidazolone derivatives. Journal of Molecular Structure. 2025 Feb 15;1322:140701.
19. Al-Jubori HM, Al-Mathkuri TS, Banoon ZR, Saleh MY. Synthesis of novel benzo [d] imidazole bearing α-aminophosphonate and their antimicrobial evaluation. Results in Chemistry. 2024 Jun 1;8:101586.
20. Wali HF, Kareem Z, Aldujaili N. Antibacterial Activity of Reduced Graphene Oxide Nanoparticles Synthesized by Klebsiella Oxytoca. Journal of Nanostructures. 2023 Oct 1;13(4):1150-1158.
21. Alzubaidy FH, Aldujaili NH. Antimicrobial and Environmental activity of biogenic CS-GO nanoparticles on Uropathogens. InIOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 2022 May 1 (Vol. 1029, No. 1, p. 012002). IOP Publishing.
22. Almamad MF, Aldujaili NH. Antibacterial and antibiofilm activity of bacterially reduced graphene oxide against some MDR bacterial pathogens isolated from urinary tract infections. InAIP Conference Proceedings 2022 Jan 11 (Vol. 2386, No. 1). AIP Publishing.
23. Al-Abboodi A, Alsaady HA, Banoon SR, Al-Saady M. Conjugation strategies on functionalized iron oxide nanoparticles as a malaria vaccine delivery system. Bionatura. 2021;3(3):2009-2016.
24. Rabeea Banoon S, Mahdi DS, Gasaem NA, Abed Hussein Z, Ghasemian A. The role of nanoparticles in gene therapy: A review. Journal of Nanostructures. 2024 Jan 1;14(1):48-64.
25. Ali ZH, Al-Saady MA, Aldujaili NH, Rabeea Banoon S, Abboodi A. Evaluation of the antibacterial inhibitory activity of chitosan nanoparticles biosynthesized by streptococcus thermophilus. Journal of Nanostructures. 2022 Jul 1;12(3):675-685.
26. Trivedi R, Upadhyay TK, Kausar MA, Saeed A, Sharangi AB, Almatroudi A, Alabdallah NM, Saeed M, Aqil F. Nanotechnological interventions of the microbiome as a next-generation antimicrobial therapy. Science of The Total Environment. 2022 Aug 10;833:155085.
27. Almamad MF, Aldujaili NH. Characterization of Graphene Oxide reduced by Bacillus clausii and its activity against MDR uropathogenic isolates. InIOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 2021 Jun 1 (Vol. 790, No. 1, p. 012044). IOP Publishing.
28. Hussein AA, Aldujaili NH. Antimicrobial, antibiofilm, and antioxidant activity of chitosan nanoparticles synthesized by E. coli. InJournal of Physics: Conference Series 2020 Nov 1 (Vol. 1664, No. 1, p. 012118). IOP Publishing.
29. Aldujaili NH, Alzubaidy FH, Hussein AA. Extracellular synthesis of silver nanoparticles by Acinetobacter baumanii and antibacterial characterization. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Public Health. 2020;23:18.
30. Solanki R, Makwana N, Kumar R, Joshi M, Patel A, Bhatia D, Sahoo DK. Nanomedicines as a cutting-edge solution to combat antimicrobial resistance. RSC advances. 2024;14(45):33568-33586.
31. Aldujaili NH, Alrufa MM, Sahib FH. Antibiofilm antibacterial and antioxidant activity of biosynthesized silver nanoparticles using Pantoea agglomerans. J Pharm Sci Res. 2017 Jul 1;9(7):1220.
32. Ioannou P, Baliou S, Samonis G. Nanotechnology in the diagnosis and treatment of antibiotic-resistant infections. Antibiotics. 2024 Jan 25;13(2):121.
33. Al-Hilli ZB, Aldujaili NH. Activity of Biosynthesized Reduced Graphene Oxide against Multidrug resistant Uropathogenic Bacteria.. Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology. 2020 Apr 1;14(2).
34. AlHasan L, Qi A, Al-Aboodi A, Rezk A, Shilton RR, Chan PP, Friend J, Yeo L. Surface acoustic streaming in microfluidic system for rapid multicellular tumor spheroids generation. InMicro/Nano Materials, Devices, and Systems 2013 Dec 7 (Vol. 8923, pp. 828-831). SPIE.
35. Dessale M, Mengistu G, Mengist HM. Nanotechnology: a promising approach for cancer diagnosis, therapeutics and theragnosis. International Journal of Nanomedicine. 2022 Aug 26;17:3735.
36. Banoon SR, Ghasemian A. The Characters of Graphene Oxide Nanoparticles and Doxorubicin Against HCT-116 Colorectal Cancer Cells In Vitro. Journal of gastrointestinal cancer. 2022 Jun;53(2):410-414.
37. Al-Abboodi A, Tjeung R, Doran P, Yeo L, Friend J, Chan P. Microfluidic chip containing porous gradient for chemotaxis study. InSmart Nano-Micro Materials and Devices 2011 Dec 23 (Vol. 8204, pp. 219-224). SPIE.
38. Kumar H, Bhardwaj K, Nepovimova E, Kuča K, Singh Dhanjal D, Bhardwaj S, Bhatia SK, Verma R, Kumar D. Antioxidant functionalized nanoparticles: A combat against oxidative stress. Nanomaterials. 2020 Jul 8;10(7):1334.
39. Samrot AV, Ram Singh SP, Deenadhayalan R, Rajesh VV, Padmanaban S, Radhakrishnan K. Nanoparticles, a double-edged sword with oxidant as well as antioxidant properties—a review. Oxygen. 2022 Nov 15;2(4):591-604.
40. Parcheta M, Świsłocka R, Orzechowska S, Akimowicz M, Choińska R, Lewandowski W. Recent developments in effective antioxidants: The structure and antioxidant properties. Materials. 2021 Apr 15;14(8):1984.
41. Flieger J, Flieger W, Baj J, Maciejewski R. Antioxidants: Classification, natural sources, activity/capacity measurements, and usefulness for the synthesis of nanoparticles. Materials. 2021 Jul 25;14(15):4135.
42. Kim Y, Abuelfilat AY, Hoo SP, Al-Abboodi A, Liu B, Ng T, Chan P, Fu J. Tuning the surface properties of hydrogel at the nanoscale with focused ion irradiation. Soft Matter. 2014;10(42):8448-8456.
43. Ali ZH, Aldujaili NH. Bio-Environmental preparation of chitosan nanoparticle using Bacillus subtilis and their biomedical activity. InIOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 2022 May 1 (Vol. 1029, No. 1, p. 012023). IOP Publishing.
44. Malik S, Muhammad K, Waheed Y. Emerging applications of nanotechnology in healthcare and medicine. Molecules. 2023 Sep 14;28(18):6624.
45. Hadi SM, Aldujaili NH. Bio-Environmental preparation of Selenium Nanoparticle using Klebsiella Pneumonia and their Biomedical Activity. InIOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 2022 May 1 (Vol. 1029, No. 1, p. 012021). IOP Publishing.
46. Baravkar PN, Sayyed AA, Rahane CS, Chate GP, Wavhale RD, Pratinidhi SA, Banerjee SS. Nanoparticle properties modulate their effect on the human blood functions. BioNanoScience. 2021 Sep;11(3):816-824.
47. Joudeh N, Linke D. Nanoparticle classification, physicochemical properties, characterization, and applications: a comprehensive review for biologists. Journal of Nanobiotechnology. 2022 Jun 7;20(1):262.
48. Khan S, Hossain MK. Classification and properties of nanoparticles. InNanoparticle-based polymer composites 2022 Jan 1 (pp. 15-54). Woodhead Publishing.
49. Kainat S, Gull N, Khan SM, Zia S, Munir S. Physicochemical attributes, structural characterization, and catalytic properties of nanomaterials. InNanomaterials in Biomass Conversion 2024 Jan 1 (pp. 143-167). Woodhead Publishing.
50. Banoon ZR, Al-Lami AK, Abbas AM. Synthesis and Studying the Optical Properties of Novel Zinc Oxide/a symmetric dimer Liquid Crystal Nanohybrid. Journal of Nanostructures. 2023 Jan 1;13(1):159-172.
51. Asha AB, Narain R. Nanomaterials properties. InPolymer science and nanotechnology 2020 Jan 1 (pp. 343-359). Elsevier.
52. Wali HF, Al-Hadrawi SW, Aldujaili NH. Biosynthesis of Silver Nanoparticles for Combating Foodborne Fungi Penicillium Digitatum and Aspergillus Flavus. Journal of Nanostructures. 2024 Jul 1;14(3):971-979.
53. Aithal PS, Aithal S. Opportunities and Challenges for Green and Eco‐Friendly Nanotechnology in Twenty‐First Century. Sustainable nanotechnology: Strategies, products, and applications. 2022 Mar 16:31-50.
54. Hassan SA, Almaliki MN, Hussein ZA, Albehadili HM, Rabeea Banoon S, Abboodi A, Al-Saady M. Development of nanotechnology by artificial intelligence: a comprehensive review. Journal of Nanostructures. 2023 Oct 1;13(4):915-932.
55. Hammami I, Alabdallah NM. Gold nanoparticles: Synthesis properties and applications. Journal of king Saud university-science. 2021 Oct 1;33(7):101560.
56. Chopra H, Bibi S, Singh I, Hasan MM, Khan MS, Yousafi Q, Baig AA, Rahman MM, Islam F, Emran TB, Cavalu S. Green metallic nanoparticles: biosynthesis to applications. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. 2022 Apr 6;10:874742.
57. Rosman NS, Harun NA, Idris I, Wan Ismail WI. Nanobiotechnology: Nature-inspired silver nanoparticles towards green synthesis. Energy & environment. 2021 Nov;32(7):1183-1206.
58. Ajinkya N, Yu X, Kaithal P, Luo H, Somani P, Ramakrishna S. Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticle (IONP) synthesis to applications: present and future. Materials. 2020 Oct 18;13(20):4644.
59. Al-Abboodi A, Alsaady HA, Banoon SR, Al-Saady M. Conjugation strategies on functionalized iron oxide nanoparticles as a malaria vaccine delivery system. Bionatura. 2021;3(3):2009-2016.
60. Kumar P, Thakur N, Kumar K, Kumar S, Dutt A, Thakur VK, Gutiérrez-Rodelo C, Thakur P, Navarrete A, Thakur N. Catalyzing innovation: Exploring iron oxide nanoparticles-Origins, advancements, and future application horizons. Coordination Chemistry Reviews. 2024 May 15;507:215750.
61. Al-Abboodi A, Albukhaty S, Sulaiman GM, Al-Saady MA, Jabir MS, Abomughaid MM. Protein conjugated superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for efficient vaccine delivery systems. Plasmonics. 2024 Feb;19(1):379-388.
62. Khafagy A, Eedarous N, Khalil W, Youssef F, Ahmed M, Mohammed F. Automated ID & AST using VITEK 2 and Prevalence of K. pneumoniae Isolated from diarrheic chicken in Sharqiyah Governorate. Suez Canal Veterinary Medical Journal. SCVMJ. 2023 Jun 1;28(1):143-155.
63. Sharma N, Sharma N, Sharma S, Sharma P, Devi B. Identification, morphological, biochemical, and genetic characterization of microorganisms. InBasic biotechniques for bioprocess and bioentrepreneurship 2023 Jan 1 (pp. 47-84). Academic Press.
64. Kalita J, Dhar SS. Synthesis of Reusable Magnetic Nanomaterials Through Green Methods and Its Applications. InSustainable Green Synthesised Nano-Dimensional Materials for Energy and Environmental Applications 2024 Dec 5 (pp. 222-240). CRC Press.
65. Ghani S, Rafiee B, Sadeghi D, Ahsani M. Biosynthesis of iron nano-particles by Bacillus megaterium and its anti-bacterial properties. Journal of Babol University of Medical Sciences. 2017 Jul 10;19(7):13-9.
66. Jayaseelan C, Ramkumar R, Rahuman AA, Perumal P. Green synthesis of gold nanoparticles using seed aqueous extract of Abelmoschus esculentus and its antifungal activity. Industrial Crops and Products. 2013 Feb 1;45:423-429.
67. Bonev B, Hooper J, Parisot J. Principles of assessing bacterial susceptibility to antibiotics using the agar diffusion method. Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy. 2008 Jun 1;61(6):1295-1301.
68. Majeed S, Danish M, Mohamad Ibrahim MN, Sekeri SH, Ansari MT, Nanda A, Ahmad G. Bacteria mediated synthesis of iron oxide nanoparticles and their antibacterial, antioxidant, cytocompatibility properties. Journal of Cluster Science. 2021 Jul;32:1083-1094.
69. Chandran M, Yuvaraj D, Christudhas L, Ramesh KV. Bio synthesis of iron nanoparticles using the brown seaweed, Dictyota dicotoma. Biotechnol. Indian J. 2016;12(12):112.
70. Zakariya NA, Majeed S, Jusof WH. Investigation of antioxidant and antibacterial activity of iron oxide nanoparticles (IONPS) synthesized from the aqueous extract of Penicillium spp. Sensors International. 2022 Jan 1;3:100164.
71. Sharma S, Sanpui P, Chattopadhyay A, Ghosh SS. Fabrication of antibacterial silver nanoparticle—sodium alginate–chitosan composite films. Rsc Advances. 2012;2(13):5837-5843.
72. Helen SM, Rani MH. Characterization and antimicrobial study of nickel nanoparticles synthesized from dioscorea (Elephant Yam) by green route. International Journal of science and Research. 2015;4(11):216-219.
73. Sharafi Z, Bakhshi B, Javidi J, Adrangi S. Synthesis of silica-coated iron oxide nanoparticles: preventing aggregation without using additives or seed pretreatment. Iranian journal of pharmaceutical research: IJPR. 2018;17(1):386.
74. Liang W, Shi H, Yang X, Wang J, Yang W, Zhang H, Liu L. Recent advances in AFM-based biological characterization and applications at multiple levels. Soft Matter. 2020;16(39):8962-8984.
75. Deng X, Xiong F, Li X, Xiang B, Li Z, Wu X, Guo C, Li X, Li Y, Li G, Xiong W. Application of atomic force microscopy in cancer research. Journal of nanobiotechnology. 2018 Dec;16:1-5.
76. Khalil AT, Ovais M, Ullah I, Ali M, Shinwari ZK, Maaza M. Biosynthesis of iron oxide (Fe2O3) nanoparticles via aqueous extracts of Sageretia thea (Osbeck.) and their pharmacognostic properties. Green Chemistry Letters and Reviews. 2017 Oct 2;10(4):186-201.
77. Balamurugan S, Ashna L, Parthiban P. Synthesis of nanocrystalline MgO particles by combustion followed by annealing method using hexamine as a fuel. Journal of Nanotechnology. 2014;2014(1):841803.
78. Manyasree D, Kiranmayi P, Kumar RV. Synthesis, characterization and anti bacterial activity of iron oxide nanoparticles. Indo Am J Pharm Res. 2016;6:65-76.
79. Loy A, Lehner A, Lee N, Adamczyk J, Meier H, Ernst J, Schleifer KH, Wagner M. Oligonucleotide microarray for 16S rRNA gene-based detection of all recognized lineages of sulfate-reducing prokaryotes in the environment. Applied and environmental microbiology. 2002 Oct;68(10):5064-5081.
80. Gudkov SV, Burmistrov DE, Serov DA, Rebezov MB, Semenova AA, Lisitsyn AB. Do iron oxide nanoparticles have significant antibacterial properties?. Antibiotics. 2021 Jul 20;10(7):884.
81. Subhashini G, Ruban P, Daniel T. Biosynthesis and characterization of magnetic (Fe3O4) iron oxide nanoparticles from a red seaweed gracilaria edulis and its antimicrobial activity. Int J Adv Sci Res Manag. 2018;3:184-189.
82. Masadeh MM, Karasneh GA, Al-Akhras MA, Albiss BA, Aljarah KM, Al-Azzam SI, Alzoubi KH. Cerium oxide and iron oxide nanoparticles abolish the antibacterial activity of ciprofloxacin against gram positive and gram negative biofilm bacteria. Cytotechnology. 2015 May;67:427-435.
83. Aldujaili NH, Banoon SR. Characterization oF Titanium Nanoparticles Nanosynthesized by Streptococcus Thermophilus. Periódico Tchê Química. 2020 Jan 1;17(34).
84. Hassan BA, Lawi ZK, Banoon SR. Detecting the activity of silver nanoparticles, pseudomonas fluorescens and Bacillus circulans on inhibition of aspergillus Niger growth isolated from moldy orange fruits. Periódico Tchê Química. 2020,17(35):678-690.
85. Al-Saady AJ, Aldujaili NH, Banoon SR, Al-Abboodi A. Antimicrobial properties of nanoparticles in biofilms. Revis Bionatura 2022; 7 (4) 71.
86. Khatami M, Alijani HQ, Haghighat M, Bamrovat M, Azhdari S, Ahmadian M, Nobre M, Heidari M, Sarani M, Khatami S. Green synthesis of amorphous iron oxide nanoparticles and their antimicrobial activity against Klebsiella pneumonia, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli. Iran J Biotechnol. 2019;10:33-39.
87. Ramezani Ali Akbari K, Abdi Ali A. Study of antimicrobial effects of several antibiotics and iron oxide nanoparticles on biofilm producing pseudomonas aeruginosa. Nanomedicine Journal. 2017 Jan 1;4(1):37-43.
88. Podder S, Chanda D, Mukhopadhyay AK, De A, Das B, Samanta A, Hardy JG, Ghosh CK. Effect of morphology and concentration on crossover between antioxidant and pro-oxidant activity of MgO nanostructures. Inorganic Chemistry. 2018 Oct 3;57(20):12727-12739.
89. Dawadi S, Katuwal S, Gupta A, Lamichhane U, Thapa R, Jaisi S, Lamichhane G, Bhattarai DP, Parajuli N. Current research on silver nanoparticles: synthesis, characterization, and applications. Journal of nanomaterials. 2021;2021(1):6687290.
90. Tatarczak-Michalewska M, Flieger J. Application of high-performance liquid chromatography with diode array detection to simultaneous analysis of reference antioxidants and 1, 1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) in free radical scavenging test. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022 Jul 7;19(14):8288.
91. Lawi ZK, Merza FA, Banoon SR, Jabber Al-Saady MA, Al-Abboodi A. Mechanisms of Antioxidant Actions and their Role in many Human Diseases: A Review. Journal of Chemical Health Risks. 2021 Sep 2;11.
92. Swain P, Das R, Das A, Padhi SK, Das KC, Mishra SS. Effects of dietary zinc oxide and selenium nanoparticles on growth performance, immune responses and enzyme activity in rohu, Labeo rohita (Hamilton). Aquaculture nutrition. 2019 Apr;25(2):486-494.
93. Agarwal V, Gupta V, Bhardwaj VK, Singh K, Khullar P, Bakshi MS. Hemolytic response of iron oxide magnetic nanoparticles at the interface and in bulk: extraction of blood cells by magnetic nanoparticles. ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces. 2022 Jan 29;14(5):6428-6441.