Chemical Synthesis of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles and Their Antimicrobial Potential Against Opportunistic Hospital Pathogens

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Al-Qadisiyah director education, Ministry of education, Iraq

2 Higher Institute of Biotechnology, University of Sfax, Tunisia

10.22052/JNS.2025.02.018

Abstract

Bacterial resistance to antibiotics is a growing global challenge. This study investigates the antimicrobial effects of zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO-NPs) on clinical strains of Acinetobacter baumannii and Staphylococcus aureus, focusing on their synergy with the antibiotic ciprofloxacin. ZnO-NPs were synthesized and characterized using XRD, FT-IR, and SEM techniques. Their antimicrobial activity was evaluated against both bacteria, and the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined. The results demonstrated that ZnO-NPs effectively inhibited bacterial growth, with enhanced effects when combined with ciprofloxacin, particularly against A. baumannii. These findings suggest that ZnO-NPs could reduce antibiotic resistance and offer a promising approach to combating multidrug-resistant bacteria.

Keywords


INTRODUCTION

Hospital-acquired infections, also known as nosocomial infections, represent a significant challenge to healthcare systems worldwide. These infections, which typically arise 48 hours after hospital admission or within three days post-discharge, are associated with high morbidity, mortality, and economic burden. Intensive care units (ICUs) are particularly prone to such infections, with Gram-negative and Gram-positive pathogens emerging as predominant culprits [1, 2]. Among Gram-negative bacteria, Acinetobacter baumannii has become a critical concern due to its remarkable resistance to almost all known antibiotics and its ability to persist in hospital environments [3, 4]. Similarly, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has long been recognized as a leading Gram-positive pathogen, responsible for severe infections and high mortality rates [5].

Antibiotic resistance, driven by the overuse and misuse of antibiotics, has escalated into a global public health crisis. Pathogens such as A. baumannii and MRSA not only exhibit resistance to multiple drugs but also possess virulence factors that enhance their pathogenicity. Traditional antibiotics have become increasingly ineffective, emphasizing the urgent need for alternative strategies to combat these multidrug-resistant pathogens [6].

Recent advancements in nanotechnology have introduced innovative approaches to antimicrobial therapy. Metal oxide nanoparticles, particularly zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO-NPs), have garnered significant attention for their potent antimicrobial properties. ZnO-NPs exhibit unique physicochemical characteristics, including a high surface-to-volume ratio, tunable shape and size, and the ability to generate reactive oxygen species (ROS). These features enable ZnO-NPs to disrupt bacterial membranes, increase cell permeability, and inhibit intracellular functions [7, 8]. Moreover, ZnO-NPs have shown promise in enhancing the efficacy of conventional antibiotics through synergistic effects, thereby addressing the limitations of monotherapy [9].

This study focuses on the antimicrobial activity of ZnO-NPs, both as standalone agents and in combination with ciprofloxacin, against clinical strains of A. baumannii and S. aureus. The research aims to investigate the synergistic effects of ZnO-NPs and ciprofloxacin, determine the mechanisms underlying their combined antimicrobial activity, and explore the potential of ZnO-NPs to counteract antibiotic resistance [10, 11]. By elucidating these mechanisms, the study seeks to contribute to the development of novel therapeutic strategies that can effectively manage multidrug-resistant infections in healthcare settings.

The results of this investigation could pave the way for the integration of nanotechnology in combating hospital-acquired infections, offering hope for addressing the pressing challenge of antibiotic resistance [7].

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Biological Studies

Sterilization of Materials and Laboratory Equipment

To maintain sterility during experiments, all tools, media, and buffers were sterilized using thermal methods and UV irradiation. Autoclaving was performed at 121°C and 103 kPa for 15–20 minutes to sterilize culture media, buffers, and other heat-resistant materials [12]. UV irradiation and 70% ethanol were employed to sterilize the working environment, including laminar flow hoods, ensuring a contamination-free setup.

 

Preparation of Culture Media

Bacterial cultures were grown using nutrient agar (NA) and nutrient broth (NB). These media are commonly used for cultivating bacteria with minimal selectivity:

Nutrient Agar (NA): To prepare the NA medium, 13 g of powdered medium was dissolved in 1 L of deionized water, followed by autoclaving for 15 minutes. After cooling to 50°C, the medium was poured into sterile petri dishes under aseptic conditions and stored at 4°C [13].

Nutrient Broth (NB): For NB preparation, 2.8 g of powdered medium was dissolved in 100 mL of deionized water. The solution was autoclaved at 121°C, allowed to cool, and stored under sterile conditions until use [13].

 

Preparation of 0.02 M NaOH Solution

A 0.02 M sodium hydroxide solution was prepared by dissolving 1 g of NaOH in 2 mL of deionized water. A 2 mL aliquot of this solution was diluted to 100 mL with deionized water, ensuring precise molarity for subsequent synthesis steps [18].

 

Synthesis of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles (ZnO-NPs)

The synthesis of ZnO-NPs was performed using a co-precipitation method with zinc acetate (C₄H₁₀O₆Zn) as the precursor and sodium hydroxide (NaOH) as the precipitating agent [3,7,14].

Step 1: A 0.21195 g sample of zinc acetate was dissolved in 90 mL of deionized water and cooled to 4°C [3,16].

Step 2: While maintaining the temperature between 0–4°C, 80 mL of 0.02 M NaOH solution was added dropwise using a burette under constant stirring [3,16].

Step 3: The reaction mixture was heated in a water bath at 65°C for 2 hours, forming a white precipitate [3,17].

Step 4: The precipitate was allowed to age at room temperature (25°C) for 3 days, then centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 20 minutes [3,14].

Step 5: The precipitate was washed four times with a 1:1 mixture of deionized water and ethanol to remove impurities [3,15].

Step 6: Finally, the washed precipitate was dried in a vacuum oven at 10–40°C for 10 hours, yielding a fine white ZnO-NP powder [3,17].

 

Preparation of ZnO Nanofluid

To prepare a nanofluid, 4 mg of ZnO-NPs was autoclaved for 15 minutes. One milliliter of autoclaved deionized water was added, and the mixture was sonicated for 15 minutes [15,18]. This stock solution was stirred magnetically for 48 hours to ensure uniform dispersion, resulting in a 4 mg/mL nanofluid concentration [14] [19].

 

Characterization of ZnO-NPs

X-ray Diffraction (XRD)

XRD analysis was performed to determine the crystalline structure of the ZnO-NPs. The nanoparticle size was calculated using the Scherrer equation:
D=βcosθkλ​

Where D = nanoparticle size, k = Scherrer constant (0.9), λ= X-ray wavelength (1.54 Å), β\betaβ = peak width, and θ\thetaθ = Bragg angle [20,21].

 

Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-IR)

FT-IR analysis identified functional groups in the synthesized nanoparticles. The spectra were recorded in the range of 4000–400 cm−1^{-1}−1 using a Thermo Nicolet AVATAR-370-FT-IR spectrometer [20,22].

 

Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS)
DLS measurements were conducted to determine the hydrodynamic size and zeta potential of ZnO-NPs in suspension. A VASCO3 DLS device was used for precise measurements [23,24].

 

Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)
The morphology and size of ZnO-NPs were analyzed using an LEO 1450 VP SEM. Samples were prepared by dispersing 10 mg of ZnO-NPs in 20 mL ethanol, followed by ultrasonication for 1 hour [23,25].

 

Bacterial Strains

Clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii and Staphylococcus aureus were obtained from a Baghdad hospital. Bacteria were cultured on NA and NB media for experimental purposes.

 

Determination of Bacterial Concentration

Bacterial suspensions were standardized using McFarland 1 (equivalent to 3×1083 \times 10^83×108 CFU/mL), prepared by mixing barium chloride and sulfuric acid to produce a turbid solution with known absorbance [24,25].

 

Bacterial Identification

Gram Staining

Gram staining was performed to classify bacteria based on cell wall properties. Gram-positive bacteria retained the violet crystal stain, while Gram-negative bacteria appeared red after counterstaining with fuchsine [26,27].

 

Antibiotic Sensitivity Testing

Disc diffusion tests were conducted using tobramycin (30 µg), tetracycline (30 µg), and ciprofloxacin (5 µg) to evaluate bacterial susceptibility. Zones of inhibition were measured after incubation at 37°C for 18 hours [28,29].

 

Determination of Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC)

MIC values were determined by exposing bacteria to ZnO-NPs in concentrations ranging from 0.015–5.0 mg/mL. Growth inhibition was monitored using an ELISA reader at 630 nm, and bacterial survival percentages were calculated [30,31].

 

Synergistic Effect of ZnO-NPs and Ciprofloxacin

The combined antimicrobial effects of ZnO-NPs and ciprofloxacin (16 µg/mL) were tested at 1/2 MIC of ZnO-NPs. Bacterial growth inhibition was assessed using optical density measurements [32,33].

 

Biofilm Inhibition Assay

Antioxidant activity of ZnO-NPs was evaluated by their ability to scavenge DPPH free radicals. Nanoparticles were incubated with DPPH solution, and absorbance at 490 nm was recorded [36,37].

 

Antioxidant Activity (DPPH Assay)

Antioxidant activity of ZnO-NPs was evaluated by their ability to scavenge DPPH free radicals. Nanoparticles were incubated with DPPH solution, and absorbance at 490 nm was recorded [36,37].

 

Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed using SPSS software. Experiments were repeated three times, and statistical significance was determined using ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc test for multiple comparisons [38,39].

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Characterization of Synthesized Nanoparticles

X-ray Diffraction (XRD) Spectrum

The structural characteristics, material composition, and crystalline properties of the synthesized zinc oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles were evaluated using X-ray diffraction (XRD). As shown in the XRD spectrum (Fig. 1), diffraction peaks were observed at angles 32.9°, 34.2°, 36.1°, 47.3°, 56.4°, 62.6°, 67.9°, and 68.8°, corresponding to the crystal planes (112), (200), (103), (110), (102), (101), (002), and (100), respectively. These peaks align with the Joint Committee on Powder Diffraction Standards (JCPDS), confirming the hexagonal wurtzite crystal structure of ZnO nanoparticles.
No additional peaks were detected, indicating the high purity of the nanoparticles. Using the Debye-Scherrer equation, the average crystalline size was calculated to be approximately 87 nm.

 

FT-IR Spectroscopy of ZnO Nanoparticles

Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy was used to identify the functional groups and chemical structure of the synthesized nanoparticles. The FT-IR spectrum (Fig. 2) exhibited characteristic absorption bands:

A strong absorption band at 3342 cm−1 corresponds to O-H stretching vibrations.

Peaks at 3155 and 2963 cm−1 are associated with C-H stretching vibrations.

A significant peak at 487 cm−1 is attributed to Zn-O stretching vibrations.

Additional peaks at 835 cm−1 and 1055 cm−1 correspond to C-N and C-O stretching vibrations, respectively.

These results confirm the presence of functional groups associated with the ZnO nanoparticles, indicating their successful synthesis.

 

Size and Zeta Potential of ZnO Nanoparticles

Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS)

Dynamic light scattering (DLS) was used to determine the size distribution of ZnO nanoparticles. The hydrodynamic diameter of the synthesized nanoparticles was measured to be 174 nm (Fig. 3), larger than the crystalline size due to hydration in aqueous suspension.

Zeta Potential

The zeta potential of the nanoparticles, measured using the Malvern Zeta Nano ZS, was determined to be -19 mV. This negative charge indicates that the nanoparticles possess a moderate colloidal stability. For optimal physical stability, the zeta potential should range between -30 mV and +30 mV.

 

Morphology of ZnO Nanoparticles

The morphology of ZnO nanoparticles was analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). As shown in the SEM images (Fig. 5), the nanoparticles exhibit a predominantly spherical shape with some faceted structures. The average particle size was consistent with that obtained from the Debye-

 

Gram Staining

Gram staining of the bacterial samples showed that Staphylococcus aureus is Gram-positive, appearing in cluster or chain forms, while Acinetobacter baumannii is Gram-negative, primarily appearing in coccobacillus forms but occasionally as rods or spheres.

 

Antibiotic Sensitivity Test Results

The antibiotic sensitivity tests revealed varying resistance patterns for the bacterial strains.

Staphylococcus aureus exhibited resistance to tetracycline, ciprofloxacin, and tobramycin, with inhibition zones of 17 mm, 18 mm, and 21 mm, respectively.

Acinetobacter baumannii showed the highest resistance to ciprofloxacin, with an inhibition zone of only 7 mm. Tobramycin and tetracycline inhibition zones were 19 mm and 15 mm, respectively.

These findings highlight the need for alternative strategies to combat Acinetobacter baumannii due to its high antibiotic resistance.

 

Antimicrobial Activity of ZnO Nanoparticles

The antimicrobial activity of ZnO nanoparticles was evaluated using the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) method. Results showed a concentration-dependent inhibition of bacterial growth. At 0.5 mg/mL, ZnO nanoparticles completely inhibited the growth of Acinetobacter baumannii and achieved a 91% growth inhibition of Staphylococcus aureus.

 

Combined Effect of ZnO Nanoparticles and Ciprofloxacin

The combined antimicrobial effect of ZnO nanoparticles (0.25 mg/mL) and ciprofloxacin (8 µg/mL) was significantly greater than either agent alone. The combination achieved a 100% inhibition of Acinetobacter baumannii, compared to 92% with ZnO nanoparticles alone and 3% with ciprofloxacin alone.

 

Antioxidant Activity of ZnO Nanoparticles

The antioxidant activity of ZnO nanoparticles was assessed using the DPPH radical scavenging assay. The highest activity (48%) was observed at a concentration of 500 µg/mL.

 

Anti-Biofilm Activity of ZnO Nanoparticles

ZnO nanoparticles inhibited biofilm formation in both Staphylococcus aureus and Acinetobacter baumannii. At 500 µg/mL, biofilm inhibition was 78% for S. aureus and 90% for A. baumannii.

 

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the potential of zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO-NPs) as a promising antimicrobial agent against drug-resistant pathogens, particularly Acinetobacter baumannii and Staphylococcus aureus. The synthesized ZnO-NPs exhibited significant antibacterial activity, with their efficacy being enhanced in combination with ciprofloxacin, demonstrating a synergistic effect that could mitigate bacterial resistance. The nanoparticles also displayed potent anti-biofilm and antioxidant properties, further underlining their multifunctional utility in combating bacterial infections.

The characterization of ZnO-NPs revealed a hexagonal wurtzite structure with nanoscale dimensions and favorable colloidal stability. The antimicrobial activity of ZnO-NPs was dose-dependent, with complete inhibition of A. baumannii observed at a concentration of 0.5 mg/mL. Moreover, their ability to inhibit biofilm formation and scavenge free radicals suggests their potential application in various biomedical fields, including infection control and wound healing.

This work underscores the importance of integrating nanotechnology with conventional antimicrobial strategies to address the growing challenge of antibiotic resistance. Future research should focus on exploring the mechanisms of action of ZnO-NPs in greater depth, assessing their biocompatibility in clinical settings, and investigating their efficacy in vivo to facilitate their translation into therapeutic applications. The promising findings of this study pave the way for the development of nanoparticle-based therapies as a complementary approach to traditional antibiotics.

 

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this manuscript.

1. Wang Y, Ren J, Yao Z, Wang W, Wang S, Duan J, et al. Clinical Impact and Risk Factors of Intensive Care Unit-Acquired Nosocomial Infection: A Propensity Score-Matching Study from 2018 to 2020 in a Teaching Hospital in China. Infection and drug resistance. 2023;16:569-579.
2. Haque M, Sartelli M, McKimm J, Abu Bakar M. Health care-associated infections - an overview. Infection and drug resistance. 2018;11:2321-2333.
3. Howard A, O’Donoghue M, Feeney A, Sleator RD. Acinetobacter baumannii: an emerging opportunistic pathogen. Virulence. 2012;3(3):243-250.
4. Vázquez-López R, Solano-Gálvez SG, Juárez Vignon-Whaley JJ, Abello Vaamonde JA, Padró Alonzo LA, Rivera Reséndiz A, et al. Acinetobacter baumannii Resistance: A Real Challenge for Clinicians. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland). 2020;9(4):205.
5. Algammal AM, Hetta HF, Elkelish A, Alkhalifah DHH, Hozzein WN, Batiha GE-S, et al. Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): One Health Perspective Approach to the Bacterium Epidemiology, Virulence Factors, Antibiotic-Resistance, and Zoonotic Impact. Infection and drug resistance. 2020;13:3255-3265.
6. Reygaert WC. An overview of the antimicrobial resistance mechanisms of bacteria. AIMS microbiology. 2018;4(3):482-501.
7. Sirelkhatim A, Mahmud S, Seeni A, Kaus NHM, Ann LC, Bakhori SKM, et al. Review on Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles: Antibacterial Activity and Toxicity Mechanism. Nano-micro letters. 2015;7(3):219-242.
8. Nagajyothi PC, Cha SJ, Yang IJ, Sreekanth TVM, Kim KJ, Shin HM. Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of zinc oxide nanoparticles synthesized using Polygala tenuifolia root extract. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology. 2015;146:10-17.
9. Raghupathi KR, Koodali RT, Manna AC. Size-Dependent Bacterial Growth Inhibition and Mechanism of Antibacterial Activity of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles. Langmuir. 2011;27(7):4020-4028.
10. Introduction. The Malvern Hills: Historic England; 2013. p. 1-10.
11. Abbes N, Bekri I, Cheng M, Sejri N, Cheikhrouhou M, Xu J. Green Synthesis and Characterization of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles Using Mulberry Fruit and Their Antioxidant Activity. Materials Science. 2022;28(2):144-150.
12. An Overview of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and Its Impact on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Protocols: CRC Press; 2007. p. 15-20.
13. Jiang S, Lin K, Cai M. ZnO Nanomaterials: Current Advancements in Antibacterial Mechanisms and Applications. Frontiers in chemistry. 2020;8:580-580.
14. Zhang L, Jiang Y, Ding Y, Povey M, York D. Investigation into the antibacterial behaviour of suspensions of ZnO nanoparticles (ZnO nanofluids). Journal of Nanoparticle Research. 2006;9(3):479-489.
15. Sharma S, Mohler J, Mahajan SD, Schwartz SA, Bruggemann L, Aalinkeel R. Microbial Biofilm: A Review on Formation, Infection, Antibiotic Resistance, Control Measures, and Innovative Treatment. Microorganisms. 2023;11(6):1614.
16. Zhao A, Sun J, Liu Y. Understanding bacterial biofilms: From definition to treatment strategies. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology. 2023;13:1137947-1137947.
17. Doğan SŞ, Kocabaş A. Green synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles with <i>Veronica multifida</i> and their antibiofilm activity. Human and Experimental Toxicology. 2019;39(3):319-327.
18. An Introduction to IBM® SPSS® Statistics and Stata. Practical Statistics: A Quick and Easy Guide to IBM® SPSS® Statistics, STATA, and Other Statistical Software: SAGE Publications, Inc.; 2011. p. 12-56.
19. Tiku V, Kofoed EM, Yan D, Kang J, Xu M, Reichelt M, et al. Outer membrane vesicles containing OmpA induce mitochondrial fragmentation to promote pathogenesis of Acinetobacter baumannii. Scientific reports. 2021;11(1):618-618.
20. Zhang L, Ding Y, Povey M, York D. ZnO nanofluids – A potential antibacterial agent. Progress in Natural Science. 2008;18(8):939-944.
21. Abebe B, Zereffa EA, Murthy HCA. Synthesis of Poly(vinyl alcohol)-Aided ZnO/Mn(2)O(3) Nanocomposites for Acid Orange-8 Dye Degradation: Mechanism and Antibacterial Activity. ACS omega. 2020;6(1):954-964.
22. Gaur P, Hada V, Rath RS, Mohanty A, Singh P, Rukadikar A. Interpretation of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Using European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) and Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) Breakpoints: Analysis of Agreement. Cureus. 2023;15(3):e36977-e36977.
23. Tayel AA, El-Tras WF, Moussa S, El-Baz AF, Mahrous H, Salem MF, Brimer L. ANTIBACTERIAL ACTION OF ZINC OXIDE NANOPARTICLES AGAINST FOODBORNE PATHOGENS. Journal of Food Safety. 2011;31(2):211-218.
24. Oie S. In vitro effects of combinations of antipseudomonal agents against seven strains of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2003;52(6):911-914.
25. Nakamura A. Combined effects of meropenem and aminoglycosides on Pseudomonas aeruginosa in vitro. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2000;46(6):901-904.
26. Cirioni O, Mocchegiani F, Ghiselli R, Silvestri C, Gabrielli E, Marchionni E, et al. Daptomycin and Rifampin Alone and in Combination Prevent Vascular Graft Biofilm Formation and Emergence of Antibiotic Resistance in a Subcutaneous Rat Pouch Model of Staphylococcal Infection. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. 2010;40(6):817-822.
27. Rodrigues FFG, Costa JGM, Coutinho HDM. Synergy effects of the antibiotics gentamicin and the essential oil of Croton zehntneri. Phytomedicine. 2009;16(11):1052-1055.
28. Talebian N, Amininezhad SM, Doudi M. Controllable synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles and their morphology-dependent antibacterial and optical properties. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology. 2013;120:66-73.
29. Joe A, Park S-H, Kim D-J, Lee Y-J, Jhee K-H, Sohn Y, Jang E-S. Antimicrobial activity of ZnO nanoplates and its Ag nanocomposites: Insight into an ROS-mediated antibacterial mechanism under UV light. Journal of Solid State Chemistry. 2018;267:124-133.
30. Mahamuni PP, Patil PM, Dhanavade MJ, Badiger MV, Shadija PG, Lokhande AC, Bohara RA. Synthesis and characterization of zinc oxide nanoparticles by using polyol chemistry for their antimicrobial and antibiofilm activity. Biochemistry and biophysics reports. 2018;17:71-80.
31. Zhang L, Jiang Y, Ding Y, Daskalakis N, Jeuken L, Povey M, et al. Mechanistic investigation into antibacterial behaviour of suspensions of ZnO nanoparticles against E. coli. Journal of Nanoparticle Research. 2009;12(5):1625-1636.
32. Bogdan J, Pławińska-Czarnak J, Zarzyńska J. Nanoparticles of Titanium and Zinc Oxides as Novel Agents in Tumor Treatment: a Review. Nanoscale research letters. 2017;12(1):225-225.
33. Jeong E, Kim CU, Byun J, Lee J, Kim H-E, Kim E-J, et al. Quantitative evaluation of the antibacterial factors of ZnO nanorod arrays under dark conditions: Physical and chemical effects on Escherichia coli inactivation. Science of The Total Environment. 2020;712:136574.
34. Tamm LK, Arora A, Kleinschmidt JH. Structure and Assembly of β-Barrel Membrane Proteins. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2001;276(35):32399-32402.
35. Farzana A, Shamsuzzaman SM. In vitro efficacy of synergistic antibiotic combinations in imipenem resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains. Bangladesh Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2017;9(1):3-8.
36. Xie Y, He Y, Irwin PL, Jin T, Shi X. Antibacterial activity and mechanism of action of zinc oxide nanoparticles against Campylobacter jejuni. Applied and environmental microbiology. 2011;77(7):2325-2331.
37. Premanathan M, Karthikeyan K, Jeyasubramanian K, Manivannan G. Selective toxicity of ZnO nanoparticles toward Gram-positive bacteria and cancer cells by apoptosis through lipid peroxidation. Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine. 2011;7(2):184-192.
38. Abebe B, Zereffa EA, Tadesse A, Murthy HCA. A Review on Enhancing the Antibacterial Activity of ZnO: Mechanisms and Microscopic Investigation. Nanoscale research letters. 2020;15(1):190-190.
39. Dundar D, Otkun M. In-vitro efficacy of synergistic antibiotic combinations in multidrug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains. Yonsei medical journal. 2010;51(1):111-116.