Journal of Nanostructures

Journal of Nanostructures

Ag2O/Zn1.8Cd0.2SnO4 Nanocomposite as a Highly Efficient Visible-light Photocatalyst for Degradation of Methyl Orange

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors
1 Iraq Ministry of Education , Babylon Education Directorate, Iraq
2 College of Nursing, University of Al-Ameed, Karbala, Iraq
3 Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, College of Pharmacy, AL-Zahraa University for Women, Karbala, Iraq
4 Department of Basic Sciences, College of Dentistry, University of Kerbala, 56001, Karbala, Iraq
5 Centre for Research on Environment and Renewable Energy, University of Kerbala, Karbala, 56001, Iraq
6 Department of Therapeutic Nutrition Technologies, Al Taff University College, 56001, Kerbala, Iraq
10.22052/JNS.2026.02.094
Abstract
A silver oxide (Ag2O) based nanocomposite (Ag2O/Zn1.8Cd0.2SnO4) was synthesized as an efficient photocatalyst operating under visible light irradiation. A facile hydrothermal route was chosen to prepare the nanocomposite. Determining the optical band gap (2.59 eV) established that the nanocomposite has the capability as a visible-light photocatalyst. The photocatalytic activity was tested for degradation of methyl orange (MO) under 150 min illumination by a visible light source. More than 93% of MO was removed using 0.05 g of the nanocomposite. To further enhance performance, the effects of solution pH of and H2O2 concentration were investigated. The MO degradation efficiency increased to around 95% and 98% by adjusting the pH to 3 and addition of 1 mL of 0.01 mM of H2O2, respectively. The excellent photocatalytic activity of the nanocomposite is truly attributed to the retarded recombination of the photo-generated charge carriers, as the result of the facilitated electronic transitions across the energy levels of the Ag2O and Zn1.8Cd0.2SnO4. Furthermore, the nanocomposite photocatalytic performance was investigated over 5 successive reaction cycles. It was revealed that the synthesized nanocomposite can repeatedly degrade the MO solution, without showing significant loss of the photocatalytic efficiency.
Keywords

INTRODUCTION
Nanotechnology has been providing practical and viable solutions to many challenges faced in recent decades [1-3]. Medical, agricultural, and industrial any various technical fields can greatly benefit from nanotechnology [4, 5]. One of the most concerning issue for scientists worldwide is environmental pollution, which can be significantly reduced through nanotechnological approaches [6, 7]. Pollutants originating from facilities, power plants, farms, and cities are destroying our planet. Aquatic life is extremely affected by these pollutants, and now many of microorganisms, fish, and even coral reefs are becoming endangered or extinct. Because, seafood constitutes a major part of the diet of people in many societies, the poisoned fish can ultimately harm consumers. Consequently, dangerous diseases such as cancer, and immune disorders are developing [8, 9].
In this context, nano-photocatalysis has motivated researchers to adopt green and environmentally-friendly methods for removing pollution from soil, air, and water [10]. Photocatalytic purification relies on an efficient photocatalyst that can operate under visible region of light to produce powerful radical for oxidizing pollutants [11, 12]. However, single-component photocatalyst materials (such as TiO2 or ZnO) rarely provide satisfying results, due to premature recombination of charge carriers (electrons and holes) formed upon illumination of photocatalysts [13, 14]. Nanocomposites composed of different metal oxides can address this requirement for synthesizing an efficient photocatalyst [15, 16]. Transition of charges between conduction bands and valence bands of different oxide materials can effectively reduce the recombination of charges and in turn enhance the photocatalytic activity of nanocomposite [17, 18].
Silver oxide (Ag2O) is regarded as a great visible-light-sensitizer for photocatalytic applications, owing to its narrow band gap, high visible light activity, high surface area providing abundant active sites, and efficient charge transfer ability [19-22]. Additionally, it has been suggested that the partial reduction of Ag+ to Ag0 forms plasmonic states on the surface of Ag2O particles, which enhance the separation of photo-generated charge carriers [23, 24]. As a result, the photocatalytic activity of the Ag2O-based compounds increases, for example: Patel et al. synthesized In2O3/Ag/Ag2O photocatalyst for degradation of ciprofloxacin and 4-nitrophenol [25]. Also, photocatalytic degradation of antibiotics has been reported using plasmonic effect of Ag/Ag2O/C3N4 photocatalyst [26]. Mohamed et al. designed an Ag2O/LaTiO3 heterojunction photocatalyst for desulfurization of thiophene under visible light irradiation [27].
Herein, a superior visible light activated nanocomposite was synthesized by mixing Ag2O and Zn1.8Cd0.2SnO4. A facile and straightforward method was employed to synthesize the Ag2O/Zn1.8Cd0.2SnO4 (Ag2O/ZCSO) nanocomposite. According to the results provided in literature, Ag2O strongly induces the visible light sensitization of photocatalysts. Therefore, it is expected that the coupling Ag2O with ZCSO will result in significantly enhanced photoactivity for degradation of organic pollutants. 
In this work, an aqueous solution of methyl orange (MO) was used as a model of organic pollutant. Methyl orange, widely used in dyeing industry, causes severe environmental damage due to its refractory nature [28, 29]. Furthermore, it is well known that methyl orange has the potential health risks for human [30]. The visible-light photocatalytic degradation of MO was evaluated by systematically examining the influence of key parameters, including amount of loaded nanocomposite, pH of MO solution, and H2O2 concentration.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Synthesis of Ag2O nanoparticles
Ag2O nanoparticles were synthesized under simple co-precipitation reaction. 1.0 mmol of AgNO3 was dissolved into 50 mL of deionized water in the presence of 0.05 g of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) as surfactant. Then, the Ag2O nanoparticles was precipitate using addition of NaOH (0.5 M). The obtained dark brown solid was separated using centrifugation, rinsed using deionized water, and heated at 120 °C overnight.

 

Synthesis of Zn1.8Cd0.2SnO4 nanoparticles
To synthesize the Zn1.8Cd0.2SnO4 nanoparticles, metal precursors including Zn(NO3).4H2O, Cd(NO3)2.4H2O, and Na2SnO3.3H2O were dissolved into a 50 mL deionized water containing 0.1 g polyethylene glycol, under vigorous stirring for 30 min. After that, to adjust the pH of solution to around 9, NaOH solution (0.5 M) was added dropwise. Next, the formed solid were separated using centrifugation and washed three times using ethanol solution (20% V/V). The solid was dried at 120 °C in an oven overnight and finally calcined at 700 °C for 6 h.

 

Synthesis of Ag2O/Zn1.8Cd0.2SnO4 nanocomposite
In order to couple the two components of nanocomposite, Ag2O and Zn1.8Cd0.2SnO4, equal amounts of the Ag2O and Zn1.8Cd0.2SnO4 (1:1) were dispersed into 50 mL of deionized water and continuously stirred for 1 h. Then, the mixture was transferred to an autoclave and subjected to hydrothermal treatment at 180 °C for a duration of 8 h. Finally, the light brown nanocomposite was separated using centrifugation and dried at 90 °C for 5 h.

 

Photocatalytic degradation procedure
The degradation of an aqueous solution of methyl orange (MO) was performed as follows: a specific amount of the nanocomposite (0.02, 0.03, 0.04, 0.05, and 0.06 g) was dispersed into the constant concentration of MO solution (50 mg/L). The mixture was magnetically stirred for 30 min in darkness in order to adsorb the MO molecules on the surface active sites of nanocomposite. Then, illumination was carried out using an Osram lamp (100 W) from a fixed distance of 40 cm for 150 min. The degradation efficiency, expressed as C/C0, where C0 and C are concentration of MO solution before and after illuminating, respectively, was determined by UV/Vis spectroscopy at characteristic maximum absorption wavelength of methyl orange (500 nm). During the photocatalytic experiment, 5 mL aliquots of the dye solution were withdrawn at 30-min intervals. The collected samples were subsequently centrifuged at 6000 rpm for 10 min to remove the nanocomposite particles, and then the absorption of photocatalytically treated MO solution was assessed. 

 

Characterization
Crystallinity and phase structure of the prepared Ag2O/ZCSO nanocomposite were characterized using X-ray diffraction (XRD) by Rigaku Ultima IV diffractometer. Morphology of the nanocomposite was investigated using field emission electron microscopy (TESCAN mira 3). Optical characteristics of the Ag2O/ZCSO nanocomposite were assessed using diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) by JASCO UV/Vis spectrophotometer.

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Structural properties
Fig. 1 shows the XRD pattern for the synthesized nanocomposite, representing the several diffraction peaks at the different angles associated with the two coupled Ag2O and Zn1.8Cd0.2SnO4 components. According to suggested JCPDS codes, the monoclinic phase of Ag2O (00-1041, marked with ♣) is identified by the peaks at 2ϴ = 32.9°, 38.1°, 54.7°, and 65.7°, while the cubic phase of Zn1.8Cd0.2SnO4 (01-074-2185, marked with ⨂) is observed at 2ϴ = 17.6°, 28.9°, 34.1°, 54.7°, and 60.1°. The crystallite size of the nanocomposite was calculated using the Scherrer method, which revealed that the nanocomposite consists of the crystallites with an average size of approximately 27.4 nm.


Surface properties and compositional analysis
FESEM image for the synthesized Ag2O/ZCSO nanocomposite, Fig. 2a and b, exhibits the semi-spherical ZCSO nanoparticle with the size range below 100 nm, anchoring onto the larger Ag2O particles. Moreover, Fig. 2c shows the EDX spectrum, which reveals the microanalysis result of the nanocomposite. As seen, the nanocomposite consists of Ag (47.22%), Zn (16.98%), Cd (2.71%), Sn (18.15%), O (14.94%), and no impurities are observed.

 

Optical properties
DRS spectrum represents the absorption behavior of the Ag2O/ZCSO nanocomposite, shown in Fig. 3. As expected, coupling Ag2O and Zn1.8Cd0.2SnO4 nanoparticles has substantial benefit for the visible-light activity of the nanocomposite. The coupling of Ag2O with ZCSO results in the formation of a heterojunction, which modifies the electronic band structure and effectively redshifts absorption edge of the nanocomposite toward the visible light region. Obviously, compared to the pure ZCSO, the nanocomposite exhibits the enhanced light absorption, which implies that the synthesized nanocomposite can efficiently operate under the visible light irradiation for degrading the organic pollutants. Using Tauc method [31] (inset to Fig. 3), the optical band gap value for the Ag2O/ZCSO was estimated to be 2.59 eV. In comparison, pure ZCSO nanoparticles have no significant the visible-light activity, with the corresponding band gap of 3.46 eV.

 

Photocatalytic experiments
The Ag2O/ZCSO nanocomposite was examined as the visible-light photocatalyst for the removal of MO. Fig. 4a shows the UV/Vis spectra of the MO solution during 150 min the photocatalytic reaction. As seen, a continuous reduction in the absorption intensity of MO was observed throughout the irradiation period, confirming the progressive decomposition of Mo molecules in the presence of the Ag2O/ZCSO nanocomposite. The effect of the nanocomposite dosage on the MO removal is further illustrated in Fig. 4b. The degradation of the MO solution approached the highest level when 0.05 g of the nanocomposite was loaded (93.1%). However, when the amount of the nanocomposite was further increased to 0.06 g, a decrease in the degradation activity was obtained. Accordingly, the photocatalyst dosage of 0.05 g can be considered the optimum loading for achieving the maximum photocatalytic removal of MO. To reason this observation, the excessive catalyst loading of the nanocomposite hinders the light beams from passing through the MO solution due to scattering, thereby leading to the lower light activation of the nanocomposite [32].

 

Investigation of pH effect 
Fig. 5 shows the efficacy of the Ag2O/ZCSO nanocomposite to degrade the MO solution at different pH values. To this end, the degradation reaction was performed using the MO solution at various pH levels (4, 7, and 10). At acidic solution (pH = 4), the MO degradation increased to 95.2%, while it decreased to 69.9% in alkaline condition (pH = 10). Because of anionic nature of methyl orange [33], the positively charged surface of the nanocomposite helps to adsorb more dye molecules on the active sites thereon [34]. As a result, the photocatalytic activity increases under acidic conditions which grants positive charges on the nanocomposite surface. 

 

Investigation of oxidant effect
In order to promote the photocatalytic reaction, H2O2 was used as an oxidant agent. Fig. 6 shows the effect of different concentrations (0.01, 0.02, 0.03, and 0.04 M) of H2O2 on the photocatalytic degradation of MO solution. As shown, when 1mL of 0.01 M of H2O2 was added, the degradation efficiency of MO solution peaked at 98.3%. It is well established that the addition of an appropriate amount of H2O2 helps to increase the degradation through formation of more oxidative radicals [35]. However, the photocatalytic activity gradually decreased as the H2O2 concentration was increased to 0.02, 0.03, and 0.04 M. The MO degradation results were recorded to be 91.7%, 88.4% and 66.5% using addition of 0.02, 0.03, and 0.04 M of H2O2, respectively. It seems that the exceeded concentration of H2O2 adversely affects the photocatalytic activity by hindering the formation of oxidative radicals [36].

 

Investigation of nanocomposite recyclability
The synthesized Ag2O/ZCSO nanocomposite was used in 5 consecutive reaction cycles. Fig. 7 shows the MO degradation efficiency using the recycled nanocomposite. After each cycle, the nanocomposite was collected, washed, and then heated at 80 °C for 5h. Fig. 7 reveals that the synthesized nanocomposite provides superior recyclability, with the decrease in the photocatalytic activity of only 5.5% after the total of 750 min (5 cycles) of the reaction time.

 

CONCLUSION
To sum up, the Ag2O/Zn1.8Cd0.2SnO4 nanocomposite was successfully synthesized. First, Ag2O and Zn1.8Cd0.2SnO4 nanoparticles were synthesized using co-precipitation method. Then, they were combined as the nanocomposite through hydrothermal route. Due to the favorable low optical band gap of the nanocomposite, 2.59 eV, the photocatalytic reaction was performed under the visible light illumination for removal of the aqueous solution of methyl orange. It is indisputable that the excited electrons can be moved to the energy levels of the Zn1.8Cd0.2SnO4 which decreases their recombination with holes. This phenomenon reflects itself in the reduced band gap value compared to the pure Zn1.8Cd0.2SnO4. After the conducted the reaction for 150 min, the MO molecules were degraded more than 93%. In addition, the photocatalytic efficiency was increased by adjusting the pH of MO solution and addition of proper amount of H2O2. Also, the Ag2O/Zn1.8Cd0.2SnO4 nanocomposite is capable of utilizing under recycled use of degradation reaction. 

 

CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this manuscript.

1. Sasikumar R, Selva Kumar T, Hamid, Jaiswal AK, Jaiswal S. Nanotechnology-enabled smart and intelligent food packaging systems. Smart and Intelligent Food Packaging: Elsevier; 2026. p. 81-107. 
2. Yousfi RE, Sayah O, Dalli M, Belkadi MC, Maleb A, Idrissi AE. Nanotechnology-based drug delivery for combating SARS-CoV-2 variants. Nanotechnology and Antivirus Nanomaterials for Combating COVID-19: Elsevier; 2026. p. 323-340. 
3. Nimesh H, Chauhan SB, Singh I, Chankhampan C. Understanding consumer/patient perspectives on the application of nanotechnology in dermatology. Nanodermatology: Elsevier; 2026. p. 103-116. 
4. Palanisamy P. Nanotechnology principles and applications in medicine. Nanomedicine and Nutrigenomics: Elsevier; 2026. p. 29-54. 
5. Obayomi OV, Mustapha LS, Obayomi KS, Dokouhaki M, Zhang J. Recent advance in nanotechnology for circular food systems: Innovations for sustainable production, waste valorization, and nutrient recovery. Journal of Hazardous Materials Advances. 2026;21:101023.
6. John CK, Ajibade FO, Ajibade TF, Kumar P, Fadugba OG, Adelodun B. The impact of international agreements and government policies on collaborative management of environmental pollution and carbon emissions in the transportation sector. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 2025;114:107930.
7. Chigwada AD, Tekere M. Nanotechnology in environmental remediation: Transforming pollution control across diverse matrices. Green Analytical Chemistry. 2026;16:100324.
8. Rasheed NA, Faridh Fawzi O, Almashhadani HA, Ismail A, Ali S, Zahid M. In-situ synthesis of sunlight-driven CuO-ZnO heterostructure photocatalyst for enhanced elimination of organic pollutants and CO2 reduction. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A. 2024;59(8):440-452.
9. Fu Y, Yi Y, Wang Y, Diao Y, Diao Z, Chen Z. A comprehensive review of modified biochar-based advanced oxidation processes for environmental pollution remediation: efficiency, mechanism, toxicity assessment. J Environ Manage. 2025;387:125872.
10. Ashina C, Pugazhenthiran N, Mangalaraja RV, Sathishkumar P. Review on enhancing solar photocatalysis for sustainable degradation of invisible environmental pollutants. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2025;214:115490.
11. Luo X, Feng Q, Wang B, Deng H, Ge C, He C, et al. First-principles investigation of novel direct-Z ZnS/ZrS2 heterojunction: Electronic properties and photocatalytic potential. Molecular Catalysis. 2025;571:114713.
12. Chawla H, Garg S, Shukla CR, Upadhyay S, Rohilla J, Szamosvölgyi Á, et al. Efficient visible light driven photocatalysis using BiOBr/BiOI heterojunction modified by Quercetin and defect engineering via simple mechanical grinding: Experiments and first-principles analysis. Mater Res Bull. 2025;184:113268.
13. Rahbar M, Hosseini-Sarvari M. Natural sunlight-driven photocatalytic mineralization of petrochemical wastewater using ceramic-supported Fe, B co-doped TiO2/CNT@WO3 in a flat panel photoreactor. Journal of Water Process Engineering. 2025;77:108328.
14. Jafarzadeh A, Sheibani S. Ag-modified, Fe, and cu-doped ZnO/g-C3N4 nanocomposite photocatalyst with enhanced activity toward degradation of pollutant and hydrogen evolution. Sustainable Materials and Technologies. 2025;44:e01360.
15. Kalpana K, Selvaraj V. A novel approach for the synthesis of highly active ZnO/TiO2/Ag2O nanocomposite and its photocatalytic applications. Ceram Int. 2015;41(8):9671-9679.
16. Koli VB, Kim J-S. Photocatalytic oxidation for removal of gases toluene by TiO2-CeO2 nanocomposites under UV light irradiation. Mater Sci Semicond Process. 2019;94:70-79.
17. Maridevaru MC, Al Marzouqi F, Nagaveni M, Kumari MM, Shankar MV, Selvaraj R. Sunlight driven Eu2O3/CoNiZn-LDH@g-C3N4 ternary heterojunction nanocomposite photocatalyst for hydrogen generation. Renewable Energy. 2025;246:122917.
18. Sathisha HC, Anitha, Krishnamurthy G, Nagaraju G. Facile green synthesis of ZnO/ZrO2 nanocomposite for photocatalytic degradation and chromium (VI) reduction. J Cryst Growth. 2025;651:128009.
19. Yu H, Liu R, Wang X, Wang P, Yu J. Enhanced visible-light photocatalytic activity of Bi2WO6 nanoparticles by Ag2O cocatalyst. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2012;111-112:326-333.
20. Xu H, Xie J, Jia W, Wu G, Cao Y. The formation of visible light-driven Ag/Ag2O photocatalyst with excellent property of photocatalytic activity and photocorrosion inhibition. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 2018;516:511-521.
21. Cui Y, Ma Q, Deng X, Meng Q, Cheng X, Xie M, et al. Fabrication of Ag-Ag2O/reduced TiO2 nanophotocatalyst and its enhanced visible light driven photocatalytic performance for degradation of diclofenac solution. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2017;206:136-145.
22. Zhao W, Zhang J, Zhu F, Mu F, Zhang L, Dai B, et al. Study the photocatalytic mechanism of the novel Ag/p-Ag2O/n-BiVO4 plasmonic photocatalyst for the simultaneous removal of BPA and chromium(VI). Chem Eng J. 2019;361:1352-1362.
23. Chu M, Fan Y, Sun Z, Kong D, Yao J, Zhang G, et al. Dynamic exchange between Ag+ and Ag0: Implications for the environmental fate of Ag nanoparticles. J Hazard Mater. 2025;494:138474.
24. Gupta A, Cho H, Pak J, Sharma SK, Lee Y, Lee S. Synergistic roles of Ag+ and Ag0 in TiO2:Ag photocatalyst for enhanced solar-driven degradation of mixed dye pollutants. Materials Today Physics. 2025;59:101952.
25. Patel S, Hase D, Bhavsar K, Pawar R, Gurav S, Murade V, et al. Biosynthesized AC supported In2O3/Ag/Ag2O photocatalyst: characterization and mechanistic insights for environmental remediation. Chemical Papers. 2026;80(7):7989-8006.
26. You C, Zhang X, Zhao Y, Yan R, Shen Y, Xue Q, et al. Plasmonic effect augmented S-scheme mechanism in Ag/Ag2O/C3N5 photocatalyst enables efficient photocatalytic degradation of antibiotics. Journal of Materials Science and Technology. 2026;242:64-74.
27. Mohamed RM, Mostafa MMM, Alroba AAN, Al-Hajji LA, Ismail AA. Design of mesoporous Ag2O/LaTiO3 heterojunction photocatalyst for the desulfurization of thiophene under visible light illumination. Ceram Int. 2026;52(9):12023-12032.
28. Ali MF, Ajeel NS, Alhares HS, Mohammed SJ, M-Ridha MJ. Phytoremediation of Congo red and methyl orange dye-contaminated water with the coontail Ceratophyllum demersum aquatic plant. International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation. 2026;207:106223.
29. Gazdagli I, Isik B, Ugraskan V. Adsorptive removal of toxic methyl orange textile dye from aqueous solutions using polypyrrole/graphitic carbon nitride composite. Fullerenes, Nanotubes and Carbon Nanostructures. 2025;34(3):224-242.
30. Hashemian PS, Renani BS, Beygi H, Javanbakht V. Magnetic polyaniline nanocomposite modified by multi-walled carbon nanotube for efficient adsorptive removal of methyl orange from aqueous solutions. Desalination and Water Treatment. 2026;326:101711.
31. Escobedo-Morales A, Pedraza-Chan MS, Ruiz-López II, Anota EC, Salazar-Villanueva M, Cortés-Arriagada D. Accurate determination of the band gap energy of non-translucent semiconductor materials through the Tauc method: Theoretical framework, limitations, technical hints, and automated algorithms. Next Materials. 2026;10:101412.
32. Kganyakgo LK, Makhado E, Hato MJ, Seleka WM, Pandey S, Masekela D. Green-synthesized Co-doped ZnO/cellulose hydrogel nanocomposites for high-efficiency photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue. South African Journal of Chemical Engineering. 2026;56:100862.
33. Sadeghi S, Najafidoust A, Mullett M, Karimi S, Zargar M. Green and charge-tuned β-cyclodextrin polymers for efficient removal of PFAS and anionic dyes from water. Journal of Water Process Engineering. 2026;84:109742.
34. Hanafi MF, Sapawe N. Influence of pH on the photocatalytic degradation of methyl orange using nickel catalyst. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2020;31:339-341.
35. Gaya UI, Abdullah AH. Heterogeneous photocatalytic degradation of organic contaminants over titanium dioxide: A review of fundamentals, progress and problems. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology C: Photochemistry Reviews. 2008;9(1):1-12.
36. Wang Y, Hong C-s. Effect of hydrogen peroxide, periodate and persulfate on photocatalysis of 2-chlorobiphenyl in aqueous TiO2 suspensions. Water Res. 1999;33(9):2031-2036.