Numerical Study of a Highly- Sensitive Nanosensor for Heavy Metal Detection

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Bonab, Bonab, Iran

2 Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Bonab, P.O. Box. 5551395133, Bonab, Iran

10.22052/JNS.2026.02.065

Abstract

Heavy metals, including mercury and lead, are among the main environmental pollutants, especially in the air, stemming from industrial production processes and fossil fuel combustion. These types of industrial contaminants pose a significant risk to human health. Here, a high throughout nanosensor is introduced which detects mercury vapor through mass-loading method in real time without any label in clean energy systems. The sensor is made of a resonator that vibrates parallel to the substrate by rotary Electrostatic actuators. When voltage is applied to the actuators, the whole system oscillates at the natural frequency. Due to the fabrication method, very thin layer of gold is deposited on both sides of the resonator. In case of mercury reaction with the gold cover resonator, the mass and stiffness of the resonator change and, consequently, the output frequency shifts. These frequency changes can be measured through output current monitoring. The proposed sensor is based on Nanoelectromechanical systems technology which is compatible with chip fabrication technologies and so the required electronic components for sensing can be integrated with it. Finite element results obtained from COMSOL Multiphysics showed at the resonance frequency of 29.22 MHz, the quality factor of the sensor is as high as 730. Additionally, the sensor has a high mass sensitivity of 7 Hz/ag, indicating its potential to detect small amounts of mercury.

Keywords


INTRODUCTION
Nanoelectromechanical systems provide the fabrication of miniature mass sensor devices that enable precise masses measurements of a gas and biological elements in the pico-gram and sub-pico-gram ranges [1-3]. Various techniques of transduction in micro and nano electromechanical systems include piezoresistive, piezoelectric, optical, capacitive, and magnetic methods, which detect and measure applied target masses as well [4-6]. 
Miniaturization of electromechanical sensors leads to some advantages such higher resonance frequencies, lower power requirements, fast response, high sensitivity, and high signal-to-noise (SNR) ratio [7-10]. 
Over the past two decades, the number of studies focusing on nanosensors and their various applications has considerably grown, which can provide physical and chemical characteristics of the target material. In physical measurement, physical properties such as temperature, pressure, and strain are observed, and in chemical measurement, chemical composition, reactions, and material composition are considered [11-14].
Different nanomaterials are used to enhance mercury detection, such as gold, silver, silica, and magnetic nanoparticles (AuNPs, AgNPs, SiO2NPs, and MNPs), hybrid combinations of silver and gold, quantum dots, electrochemical materials, and nanostructures based on carbon [15].
Nano-sensors based on gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) are more effective in mercury sensing, taking advantage of specific properties of gold such as stability, biocompatibility, and easy of functionalization. In these sensors, the surface plasmon resonance method can be exploited for mercury ion trace through colorimetric detection. Moreover, due to the high surface-to-volume ratio of gold nanostructures, active sites for binding with mercury ions increase, therefore, high sensitivity is achieved [16]. 
Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) are one of the key components in developed sensors due to their unique optical interaction with light. This interaction is known as localized surface plasmon Resonance (LSPR), a process where sub-wavelength conductive particles contain and oscillate light waves. The resulting unique light absorption profile enables these nanoparticles to function as highly discerning and responsive indicators when exposed to target chemicals [17, 18].
Hybrid gold-silver nanoparticles (NPs) are becoming the preferred material for high-performance mercury ion detection. Their advantage stems from the combined strengths of the constituent elements: the conductive properties of Ag and the durability of Au. This bimetallic setup enhances detection limits and differentiation capability. Critically, the interface between the two noble metals offers precise control over surface chemistry, allowing for the targeted adjustment of the sensor’s attraction to mercury [19, 20].
The unique characteristics of Carbon Dots (sub-10 nm carbon nanoparticles) make them ideal components for detection technology. Their distinctive optical and electronic signatures support their wide-ranging use as powerful sensor platforms. A promising area for these materials is the creation of CD-based nanosensors for mercury (Hg) analysis. These devices offer superior sensitivity and target specificity and can be finely tuned for optimal mercury affinity through surface engineering and functionalization [21, 22].
Quantum Dots (QDs), semiconductor with particles size of 2–10 nm, are chosen for their size-dependent optical and electronic adjustability. This quantum confinement effect permits the specific engineering of their band gaps, which is ideal for sensor design. Their interaction with mercury ions is characterized by clear changes in fluorescence, establishing QDs as a versatile and effective platform for fast, accurate mercury detection [23, 24].
Advanced detection based on electrochemical nanosensors, offering a robust and sensitive way to find mercury. These sensors function by harnessing the electrocatalytic power of nanoscale materials, nanoparticles, or nanotubes, enabling quick and selective analysis. The key to their enhanced performance (sensitivity and specificity) lies in the precise engineering of the electrode interface and the composition of the nanostructure [25].
Silica nanoparticles are highly suitable for nanosensor construction because of their stability, biocompatibility, and flexibility. Their high surface area and tunable surface chemistry provide a powerful platform for the selective and sensitive measurement of mercury ions. To achieve this superior detection capability, silica NPs are modified with specific recognition elements (receptors), which increases their binding specificity and sensitivity toward the target metal [25, 26].
Magnetic nano-sensor (MNPs) are a popular choice for mercury sensing because of their appealing magnetic qualities, small size, and capacity for surface modification. A major advantage is that their magnetic nature simplifies the isolation of the sensing material from complex matrices. This ease of retrieval has driven extensive scientific exploration into numerous magnetic nanosensor architectures for targeted mercury detection [27, 28].
Mercury sensing can be achieved using eco-friendly nanosensors derived from versatile organic scaffolds. These sensors are generally polymer- or biomolecule-based and are chemically tailored to bind selectively with mercury ions. The organic structure facilitates biocompatibility and simplifies the tuning of performance parameters (selectivity/sensitivity). This class of nanosensors is particularly advantageous due to its modifiability and compatibility with existing detection technologies [29].
Various nanostructures for mass sensing such doubly clamped beams and cantilevers are used for different applications, with their limitations and capabilities [30-40].
The aim of this research is to design and analyze a novel mass sensor with nanoelectromechanical system that utilizes suspended gold coated resonator for detecting mercury in the picogram range. The innovative design includes the development of a configuration of resonated suspended by four springs connected to a central anchor which enable high-resolution in in-plane resonance and eliminating the additional labels for mercury trapping as shown in Fig. 1. Notably, due to miniaturized size, the mass sensor (10 × 10 μm) with gold coated surfaces is a candidate for various applications such as medical and health demanding [41, 42]. Furthermore, the proposed mass sensors can be integrated in a single chip with peripheral electronic for actuation and sensing parts.
This paper discusses first the design and dimension of different part of the sensor. Following this, the applied theory for damping and quality factor is expressed in details. Afterward, the dynamic response of the mass sensor is studied and discussed.
The high resonance frequency reveals that the proposed resonator is highly-sensitive enough to trace mercury vapor in clean energy purposes where good linearity of sensitivity is obtained. 

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Design and Construction
The proposed nanosensor consists of a circular resonator covered by a very thin gold layer to trap mercury vapor which is connected to central anchor by four springs. Electrostatic actuator and capacitive sensing are used to drive the resonator vibrate in in-plane mode and to sense the absorbed target mass on the resonator, as shown in Fig. 2. To increase the reaction of target particles with the functionalized surface, etch holes are used in the resonator which allows the gold to be deposited under the sensor. Each set of finger has two groups of electrodes, fixed and movable, with a minimum gap between them to reach maximum momentum at low drive voltage. Using polysilicon as the body material through surface micromachining, the proposed structure can be produced without extra complexity. The total size of this nanosensor is about 10*10 μm2 with thickness of 150 nm, and other related dimensions are shown in Fig. 3 and are listed in Table 1. 
When mercury deposits on the resonator, total mass of the resonator increases therefore frequency of the sensor decrease. These frequency changes can be measured through output current between finger electrodes in sensing part. In other words, when gold reacts with mercury vapor, the capacitive value been electrodes changes and monitoring the output current results the frequency shifts.

 

Quality factor, Damping effect, and Sensitivity
One of the resonator specifications describing the way the sensor works is quality factor that indicates the accuracy and stability of the response in the long-term measurements. High value of quality factor indicates the sharpness of the output signal and lower damping in a resonator. Among different damping sources, viscous damping resulting from target particles and anchor damping are considered as below:

 

 

Qanchor and Qviscous are the quality factors of anchor and viscous damping consisting of sliding and stokes damping in the system, which are related to the damping of the gas present in the minimal distance between the sensor and the substrate, and the stokes damping due to the target particles on the reaction area, [43]. In the following, the theory behind of the two types of sliding and stokes damping are represented.
Considering the application of the introduced sensor in a gaseous environment, viscous damping is divided into two parts including damping under and on the sensor shown in Fig. 4. 
Under the proposed sensor, because of high resonance frequency and very small gap between the structure and the substrate, transition flow conditions are set up (0.1< Kn<10). Thus, the damping factor follows (Eq. 2) [43]:

 

 

Where, A,, and z0 are angular velocity, dynamic viscosity, the sensor area, the free mean molecular path, and the gap distance, respectively.
For the stokes layer of the gas flow on the active area of the sensor, related damping coefficient is expressed as [43]: 

 


Regarding anchor loss, when the proposed sensor vibrates parallel to the substrate, acoustic waves propagate from the central anchor to the substrate, so the mechanical energy decrease. This phenomenon, a part of other damping sources, is studied through simulation using COMSOL Multiphysics under condition shown in Fig. 5 where a perfectly matched layer (PML) to absorb wave propagation within the substrate.
As the introduced sensor is designed to detect mercury particles, the mass sensitivity is a crucial parameter that should be assessed. The frequency shifts resulted from the added mass on the reaction area to the detected mass is defined as a mass sensitivity factor which follows [43]: 

 

 

∆f0 is the resonance frequency shift, f0 is the working frequency, and ∆m is the added target mass.

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Finite element method was used to study the proposed sensor structurally in a 3D environment. Performance characteristics of the system was extruded by solid mechanics physics in the COMSOL Multiphysics including natural resonance frequency, frequency response, quality factor, and mass sensitivity. All required specifications used in the simulation are listed in Table 2.

 

Natural frequencies
To obtain natural resonance frequency, eigen frequency study was done regarding zero displacement condition for the central anchor (u=v=w=0) of the proposed sensor. According to Fig. 1a, there are a lot of resonance frequency that the structure moves in various mode shapes, so the desired modes shape with frequency of 29.22 MHz is where the sensor vibrate parallel to the substrate around the z-axis as the Fig. 1b.

 

Anchor loss 
A spherical substrate with a perfectly matched layer (PML) was assumed to simulate the anchor loss. As Fig. 7 illustrates, the wave propagation from the anchor is absorbed by the perfectly matched layer. Using eigen frequency analysis through solid mechanics physics and under the mentioned condition, the quality factor of a resonator is 2e4 which is defined as the ratio of the real and imaginary components of its eigenvalue. Considering this high quality factor, it seems that the viscous damping is likely to be the dominant damping source in the sensor.

 

Frequency response
The structural analysis is done around the resonance frequency of the nanosensor with the boundary conditions of the slip wall boundary and shear and vertical forces at the bottom and top of the sensor, respectively. The displacement value at a point on the sensor is used to represent frequency response and mass shown in Fig. 8. In fact, by applying proper electrostatic force from the actuators to the central oscillator, the sensor begins to vibrate, and with the settling of the mercury vapor in the gold-coated sensing area, the resonance frequency decreases.
Fig. 8a illustrates the frequency response of the sensor which has two peaks, at frequencies of 29.206 MHz and 29.246 MHz, respectively. Considering the small size of the structure and the expectation of high operating frequency for the sensor, the results confirm that at the resonance frequency of 29.22 MHz, the quality factor of the sensor resulted from viscous damping is approximately equal to 730 which is the ratio of the resonance frequency to frequency difference of the mentioned two peaks [44]. In comparing the quality factor of anchor loss with viscous damping, the total quality factor of the sensor is almost 730. Due to the very small gap between the sensor and the substrate and the resulting viscous resistance to sensor movement, this low value for the quality factor is acceptable.
To determine the mass sensitivity profile of the sensor, different concentrations of the target were applied to the simulation and the finite element results indicate that by increasing 1 ag of mercury concentration on the reaction area, the resonance frequency decreased to 7 Hz, as shown in Fig. 8b. This value of sensitivity is reasonable because in design of the sensor, on both sides of the resonator, a sensitive material to mercury was assumed.
This high mass sensitivity makes the sensor detect mercury precisely in low concertation for environmental pollution and clean energy applications.
The results obtained from the simulation are significant and can potentially be used for the detection of mercury vapor in environmental pollution and clean energy applications. In Table 3, a comparison between the proposed sensor and similar cases is made. Based on the finite element and analytical results, the proposed mercury sensor is comparable to the experimental data provided by reported research.

 

CONCLUSION
In this research, a highly sensitive nanosensor was designed to trace mercury vapor as a toxic pollutant in environmental issues. Electrostatic actuators are used to drive the active area and capacitive sensing method is used to measure target particle through frequency changes. The innovation of this system is the use of gold on both sides of the sensor, which increases sensitivity as obtained in finite element-based simulation results. Additionally, the whole structure rotates around the z axis and parallel to the substrate, which reduces the damping effect on the performance. The results of structural simulation in solid-state mechanics of the COMSOL Multiphysics tool and analytical approach show that this sensor detects mercury in the picogram range at a frequency of 29.22 MHz. In addition, the proposed sensor is capable to detect mercury particles in the environment in real-time state without using extra nanomaterial, labels and complicated sensing equipment.


ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
This research is supported by the research grant of the University of Bonab (Grant Number 1402/P/01).

 

CONFILICTS OF INTEREST
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this manuscript.

1. Karami H, Thurn B, de Boer NK, Ramos J, Covington JA, Lozano J, et al. Application of gas sensor technology to locate victims in mass disasters – a review. Nat Hazards. 2024;121(1):31-60.
2. Buryakov IA, Buryakov TI, Matsaev VT. Mass-sensitive micro- and nanosensors for detecting the vapors of explosives and associated substances. J Anal Chem. 2014;69(4):299-310.
3. Ionic-Based Electrochemical Gas Sensors for Low-Cost High-Sensitivity SO2 Detection. American Chemical Society (ACS). http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsaelm.5c02352.s001
4. Baharfar M, Lin J, Kilani M, Zhao L, Zhang Q, Mao G. Gas nanosensors for health and safety applications in mining. Nanoscale Advances. 2023;5(22):5997-6016.
5. Wang L, Song J, Yu C. Recent progress on mass-sensitive gas sensors for environmental and industrial applications. Measurement. 2025;249:117039.
6. Munawar A, Ong Y, Schirhagl R, Tahir MA, Khan WS, Bajwa SZ. Nanosensors for diagnosis with optical, electric and mechanical transducers. RSC Advances. 2019;9(12):6793-6803.
7. Karimzadehkhouei M, Ali B, Jedari Ghourichaei M, Alaca BE. Silicon Nanowires Driving Miniaturization of Microelectromechanical Systems Physical Sensors: A Review. Adv Eng Mater. 2023;25(12).
8. Liu X, Liu W, Ren Z, Ma Y, Dong B, Zhou G, et al. Progress of optomechanical micro/nano sensors: a review. International Journal of Optomechatronics. 2021;15(1):120-159.
9. Zou X, Ahmed S, Fariborzi H. A Micro-Resonator-Based Programmable Hysteresis Comparator.  2022 IEEE 35th International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems Conference (MEMS); 2022/01/09: IEEE; 2022. p. 483-486.
10. Ghaemi N, Nikoobin A, Ashory MR. A Comprehensive Categorization of Micro/Nanomechanical Resonators and Their Practical Applications from an Engineering Perspective: A Review. Advanced Electronic Materials. 2022;8(11).
11. Rong G, Tuttle EE, Neal Reilly A, Clark HA. Recent Developments in Nanosensors for Imaging Applications in Biological Systems. Annual Review of Analytical Chemistry. 2019;12(1):109-128.
12. Li X, Sun W, Fu W, Lv H, Zu X, Guo Y, et al. Advances in sensing mechanisms and micro/nanostructured sensing layers for surface acoustic wave-based gas sensors. Journal of Materials Chemistry A. 2023;11(17):9216-9238.
13. Xu X, Liu W, Jiang H, Ma W, Wang M, Sun G. Design of mesoporous Carbon/SnO2 micro/nanostructured ethanol sensors. Mater Sci Semicond Process. 2024;179:108479.
14. Kang K, Park J, Kim B, Na K, Cho I, Rho J, et al. Self-Powered Gas Sensor Based on a Photovoltaic Cell and a Colorimetric Film with Hierarchical Micro/Nanostructures. ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces. 2020;12(35):39024-39032.
15. Nikkey, Swami S, Sharma N, Saini A. Captivating nano sensors for mercury detection: a promising approach for monitoring of toxic mercury in environmental samples. RSC Advances. 2024;14(27):18907-18941.
16. Donati P, Moglianetti M, Veronesi M, Prato M, Tatulli G, Bandiera T, et al. Nanocatalyst/Nanoplasmon‐Enabled Detection of Organic Mercury: A One‐Minute Visual Test. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2019;58(30):10285-10289.
17. Aminu A, Oladepo SA. Fast Orange Peel-Mediated Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles and Use as Visual Colorimetric Sensor in the Selective Detection of Mercury(II) Ions. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering. 2020;46(6):5477-5487.
18. Ahmed F, Ali I, Saad Ali H, Yasmeen S, Ullah S, Burki S, et al. Synthesis and characterization of a plant growth regulator based silver nanoparticles for the ultrasensitive detection of environmentally toxic Hg2+ ions in tap water. New J Chem. 2021;45(38):18039-18047.
19. Wang Y, Shang M, Wang Y, Xu Z. Droplet-based microfluidic synthesis of (Au nanorod@Ag)–polyaniline Janus nanoparticles and their application as a surface-enhanced Raman scattering nanosensor for mercury detection. Analytical Methods. 2019;11(31):3966-3973.
20. Guo Z, Barimah AO, Guo C, Agyekum AA, Annavaram V, El-Seedi HR, et al. Chemometrics coupled 4-Aminothiophenol labelled Ag-Au alloy SERS off-signal nanosensor for quantitative detection of mercury in black tea. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy. 2020;242:118747.
21. Swathilakshmi, Anandhan S. Recent development in carbon dot-based gas sensors. Sensors and Diagnostics. 2022;1(5):902-931.
22. Xiao Z, Cheng B, Wang C, Wang Z. High Stability and Strong Fluorescence of Carbon Nanodots as Nanosensor for Hg2+ in Environmental Waters. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 2019;104(1):57-63.
23. Achadu OJ, Revaprasadu N. Microwave-assisted synthesis of thymine-functionalized graphitic carbon nitride quantum dots as a fluorescent nanoprobe for mercury(II). Microchimica Acta. 2018;185(10).
24. Raj SI, Jaiswal A, Uddin I. Ultrasmall aqueous starch-capped CuS quantum dots with tunable localized surface plasmon resonance and composition for the selective and sensitive detection of mercury(ii) ions. RSC Advances. 2020;10(24):14050-14059.
25. Tsao Y-H, Husain RA, Lin Y-J, Khan I, Chen S-W, Lin Z-H. A self-powered mercury ion nanosensor based on the thermoelectric effect and chemical transformation mechanism. Nano Energy. 2019;62:268-274.
26. Wang L, Wang T, Shao M, Jing W, Yu J, Wang M, et al. The emission quenching of upconversion nanoparticles coated with amorphous silica by fluorescence resonance energy transfer: A mercury-sensing nanosensor excited by near-infrared radiation. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy. 2021;254:119608.
27. Hu Y, Guo X, Wang H, Luo Q, Song Y, Song E. Magnetic-Separation-Assisted Magnetic Relaxation Switching Assay for Mercury Ion Based on the Concentration Change of Oligonucleotide-Functionalized Magnetic Nanoparticle. ACS Applied Bio Materials. 2020;3(5):2651-2657.
28. Ganjali MR, Hosseini M, Khobi M, Farahani S, Shaban M, Faridbod F, et al. A novel europium-sensitive fluorescent nano-chemosensor based on new functionalized magnetic core–shell Fe3O4@SiO2 nanoparticles. Talanta. 2013;115:271-276.
29. Karuk Elmas SN, Dinckan S, Arslan FN, Aydin D, Savran T, Yilmaz I. A rhodamine based nanosensor platform for Hg2+ sensing in near–perfect aqueous medium: Smartphone, test strip and real sample applications. J Photochem Photobiol A: Chem. 2021;421:113521.
30. Kumar P, Pawaskar DN, Inamdar MM. Mass sensing based on nonlinear intermodal coupling via 2:1 internal resonance of electrostatically actuated clamped–clamped microbeams. International Journal of Dynamics and Control. 2023;12(7):2128-2143.
31. Yu H, Wang M, Mao S, Chen Y, Lei S. Coupled micromechanical resonator for mass detection. Mod Phys Lett B. 2022;36(06).
32. Alunda BO, Lee YJ. Review: Cantilever-Based Sensors for High Speed Atomic Force Microscopy. Sensors. 2020;20(17):4784.
33. Chauhan S, Ansari MZ. Vacuum-assisted piezoelectric cantilever mass sensor performance. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology. 2021;35(12):5489-5494.
34. Setiono A, Bertke M, Nyang’au WO, Xu J, Fahrbach M, Kirsch I, et al. In-Plane and Out-of-Plane MEMS Piezoresistive Cantilever Sensors for Nanoparticle Mass Detection. Sensors. 2020;20(3):618.
35. Wang D, Xu P, Cui Y, Zhang Y, He J, Lu L, et al. A Zinc Oxide Nanobeam Resonator for Ultrasensitivity Mass Detection. Advanced Electronic Materials. 2023;9(7).
36. Shinde PB, Shiurkar UD. MEMS for detection of environmental pollutants: A review pertains to sensors over a couple of decades in 21st century. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2021;44:615-624.
37. Yaqoob U, Jaber N, Alcheikh N, Younis MI. Selective multiple analyte detection using multi-mode excitation of a MEMS resonator. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1).
38. Nabavi SK, Moghadam A-rK, Salahi S. A Highly Sensitive Surface Acoustic Wave Sensor for Continuous Respiratory Monitoring.  2023 IEEE SENSORS; 2023/10/29: IEEE; 2023. p. 1-4.
39. Macagnano A, Perri V, Zampetti E, Ferretti AM, Sprovieri F, Pirrone N, et al. Elemental mercury vapor chemoresistors employing TiO2 nanofibers photocatalytically decorated with Au-nanoparticles. Sensors Actuators B: Chem. 2017;247:957-967.
40. Pradhan AK, Acharya S. Applications of Nanosensor System in the Detection of Heavy Metals. Nanotechnology in Biology and Medicine: CRC Press; 2019. p. 215-223. 
41. Zhang Y, Gao S, Li H, Yang T, Zheng K, Guo ZM, et al. Design Principles of Nanosensors for Multiplex Detection of Contaminants in Food. Small. 2025;21(26).
42. Lenar N, Paczosa-Bator B. Nanosensors and Microsensors for Body Fluid Monitoring: Various Analyte Detection and Construction Solutions. Int J Mol Sci. 2025;26(11):5001.
43. Lobontiu N. Dynamics of Microelectromechanical Systems. Microsystems: Springer US; 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-68195-5
44. Bertke M, Hamdana G, Wu W, Wasisto HS, Uhde E, Peiner E. Analysis of asymmetric resonance response of thermally excited silicon micro-cantilevers for mass-sensitive nanoparticle detection. Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering. 2017;27(6):064001.
45. Fratoddi I, Cerra S, Salamone TA, Fioravanti R, Sciubba F, Zampetti E, et al. Functionalized Gold Nanoparticles as an Active Layer for Mercury Vapor Detection at Room Temperature. ACS Applied Nano Materials. 2021;4(3):2930-2940.
46. Salcedo ARM, Sevilla FB. Colorimetric determination of mercury vapor using smartphone camera-based imaging. Instrumentation Science and Technology. 2017;46(4):450-462.
47. Mihajlovic M, Nikolic S, Savic A. Monetary Policy Risks on the Development of Entrepreneurship.  Security and Crisis Management - Theory and Practice: Rasec; 2022.
48. Kabir KMM, Sabri YM, Matthews GI, Ippolito SJ, Bhargava SK. Cross sensitivity effects of volatile organic compounds on a SAW-based elemental mercury vapor sensor. Sensors Actuators B: Chem. 2015;212:235-241.
49. Griffin MJ, Kabir KMM, Coyle VE, Kandjani AE, Sabri YM, Ippolito SJ, et al. A Nanoengineered Conductometric Device for Accurate Analysis of Elemental Mercury Vapor. Environmental Science and Technology. 2015;50(3):1384-1392.
50. Sabri YM, Kojima R, Ippolito SJ, Wlodarski W, Kalantar-zadeh K, Kaner RB, et al. QCM based mercury vapor sensor modified with polypyrrole supported palladium. Sensors Actuators B: Chem. 2011;160(1):616-622.