Study of Structural Properties and Antibacterial Application of PVA/Ag2O Nanocomposite: ZnO Films

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Department of Physics, College of Science, University of Babylon, Iraq

10.22052/JNS.2024.03.003

Abstract

A range of liquid compositions based on poly (vinyl alcohol) (PVA) and including zinc and silver oxide nanoparticles have been developed. Other consistency-forming organic components were also present in the formulations. The products’ physicochemical characteristics have been ascertained. They have had their density and pH evaluated. Moreover, the compositions were also examined under a microscope and by SEM. Adding metallic nanoparticles and metal oxide enhanced the items with antibacterial qualities. Their ability to impede the growth of germs has been verified in instances involving Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, including S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, and E. coli. Owing to their solidification properties, the compositions can be applied to surfaces contaminated with bacteria. Once the microorganisms are destroyed and the material solidifies, it can be separated from the dead bacterial layer by peeling off.

Keywords


INTRODUCTION

Nanotechnology is one of the sciences that is reportedly developing the fastest. It allows for creating new technical solutions and improving existing ones through materials having at least one dimension between (1) and (100) nm [1]. 

The increasing body of information regarding nanomaterials and the advancement of science procedures make Is it feasible to regulate the final product’s size and form nanoparticles, which in turn enables the development of new, favorable physic-chemical characteristics in the materials. The fields with the most significant breakthroughs are medical, Environmental engineering, biotechnology, electronics, food technology, and chemical and material engineering [2]. The battle against microbes is effectively waged with nanomaterials. The growth of antibiotic-resistant kinds of bacteria due to abuse of antibiotic medication has made the fantastic efficacy of nanoparticles against bacteria all the more important these days. There are multiple methods for destroying bacteria depending on the type of nanoparticle. When Nanoparticles create pores on the bacterial wall after penetrating it. membrane’s surface, they release free radicals that burst the cell membrane [3]. Moreover, reactive oxygen species (ROS) and ions produced by Using nanoparticles, you can synthesis Proteins have an impact on DNA transcription [4]. Of all the nanomaterials, nanometric silver is of particular interest. The nano silver particle’s size, form, and surface area are some of the factors that influence how effective its biocidal action is [5]. Studies have indicated that bacterial resistance is best exhibited by spherical and triangular forms up to 30 nm in size [5–6]. The antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles is also influenced by the type of bacteria and the composition of their cell walls [7]. The peptidoglycan on the surface of Gram (+) bacteria’s cell wall is necessary for the respiratory chain to function properly. These peptidoglycans are affected by nano silver, which makes them incapable of aiding in oxygen respiration and killing the bacteria [8]. Microbial cell ions produce reactive oxygen species, leading to lipid peroxidation and protein oxidation [9]. The biocidal effectiveness of nanometric metal oxides, such as ZnO and Ag2O, has also been tested [10–11]. The literature [12, 13] does not explicitly specify how effective zinc oxide nanoparticles are against microorganisms that are Gram-positive (G (+)) and Gram-negative (G(−)).Tayel et al.’s [14] investigation of zinc nano oxide’s antibacterial properties against nine bacterial strains revealed that Gram-positive bacteria are more vulnerable to the substance’s antibacterial activities than Gram-negative bacteria. Similar conclusions were reached by Reddy and colleagues [15]. They showed that, in contrast to Gram-positive bacteria, the amount of zinc oxide nanoparticles needed to stop Gram-negative bacteria from developing must be three times higher. In turn, Pasquet, Applerot, and colleagues published several observations [12, 16]. According to their research, bacteria made up of outer cell membranes are more susceptible to the antibacterial effects of zinc oxide nanoparticles. As a result, numerous theories have been put out to describe the operation of nanos Zinc oxide is effective against Gram-positive bacteria. O. is thought to adhere The double lipid layer, or peptidoglycan, is assumed to be extremely sensitive to ROS produced due to ZnO activity [16]. to a specific receptor within a bacterial cell. This article presents research on compositions based on poly (vinyl alcohol) (PVA), including zinc and silver oxide nanoparticles, and the antibacterial activity of these materials. On surfaces polluted by microorganisms, a liquid application of the mixture is suggested. The products are great because they only take a few hours to solidify full the double-to-peptidoglycan combination may detach from the dead biological layer during application and solidification. Steakolococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were used to measure the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and bacterial cell reduction against Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens. The double lipid layer is the lipid layer, or peptidoglycan, which is y. were employed. Three times, they demonstrated [17].

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using a casting approach, polyvinyl alcohol (13.7g) was dissolved in 160 ml of distilled water with a magnetic stirrer for 45 minutes at 60 °C to create a more uniform solution. This resulted in films of zinc oxide, silver oxide, and polyvinyl alcohol. ZnO-Ag2O nanocomposites, zinc oxide and silver oxide nanoparticles were added to the polymer mixture to create PVA. To create PVA: ZnO-Ag2O nanocomposites, on the other hand, add zinc oxide and silver oxide in varying weight percentages (1, 2, and 3). PVA: ZnO-Ag2O polymer nanocomposites were created when the solution was dried for 24 hours at room temperature. The solution was then put into a petri dish and used for measurement. Samples with a thickness of about 100 nm ZnO-AgO NCs are PVA’s structural and optical components.

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM)

Amount of nanoparticles in the polymer mixtures affects the surface profile Fig. 1 presents SEM images of the PVA mixture with varying concentrations of zinc oxide and silver oxide nanoparticles to examine the morphology of the nanocomposites and how the nanoparticle arrangement varies at low and high concentrations of nanoparticles. When charge carriers are let to go across the tracks in the PVA, SEM pictures show equally distributed nanoparticles [18]. On the surface of the nanocomposite membranes, numerous spherical particle agglomerates or pieces are widely separated and uniformly distributed. This could indicate a homeostatic mechanism for growth. The amount of nanoparticles in the polymer mixtures affects the surface profile. The grains clump together when Ag2O and ZnO NPs increase. The outcomes will display the membranes ‘ surface morphology after adding 3-weight percent Ag2O and ZnO NPs to PVA. The presence of a homogeneous growth mechanism is shown by the formation of many spherical particle aggregates or chunks on the surface of nanocomposites and by the steady increase in the Ag2O and ZnO NPs ratio in PVA. It becomes softer as the concentration of both particles rises, and this is consistent with the researchers’ findings, where nanoparticles aggregate and are evenly distributed inside PVA to form a continuous network within the polymers [19]. 

 

Application of PVA-Ag2O-ZnO Nanocomposites for Antibacterial Activity

Fig. 2 shows photographs of the inhibitory zone containing Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus ry microorganisms. The antibacterial properties of the (PVA: Ag2O-ZnO) nanocomposites against gram-positive (Staphylococcus aureus) and gram-negative (Escherichia coli) bacteria are depicted in Fig. 3 and (4). These plots show that the diameter of the inhibitory zone grows along with an increase in Si3N4 nanoparticle concentration. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) formed by various processes may cause the antibacterial activity of nanocomposites [20, 21]. Tiny particles the primary mechanism behind the antibacterial properties of nanocomposites created by nanoparticles could be oxidative stress caused by ROS. Reactive oxygen species (ROS), which comprise radicals like superoxide radicals (O2), hydroxyl radicals (-OH), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and singlet oxygen (1O2), have the potential to damage proteins and DNA in bacteria [22]. The ROS that produced metal oxides may have inhibited most harmful microorganisms. Nonetheless, the bacteria and the nanoparticles are attracted to one other electromagnetically because the nanoparticles in the nanocomposites are negatively charged. As the attraction develops, the bacteria oxidize and die [23]. Table 1 shows nanocomposites’ inhibitory zone diameter (PVA: Ag2O-ZnO).            

           

CONCLUSION  

The surface morphology was well distributed and had good quality in the SEM scans. According to SEM pictures, the substance and sample have a smooth distribution at 3 weight per cent concentration. The antimicrobial treatment outcomes for Ag2O-ZnO (PVA) The inhibitory zone for S. aureus and E. coli expanded with increasing concentrations of Ag2O and ZnO nanoparticles, as evidenced by nanocomposites. At a concentration of 3 weight per cent, the results demonstrated the good antibacterial activity of the (PVA: Ag2O-ZnO) nanocomposites.

 

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this manuscript.

1. Teulon J-M, Godon C, Chantalat L, Moriscot C, Cambedouzou J, Odorico M, et al. On the Operational Aspects of Measuring Nanoparticle Sizes. Nanomaterials. 2018;9(1):18.
2. Salamanca-Buentello F, Persad DL, Court EB, Martin DK, Daar AS, Singer PA. Nanotechnology and the Developing World. PLoS Med. 2005;2(5):e97.
3. Prabhu S, Poulose EK. Silver nanoparticles: mechanism of antimicrobial action, synthesis, medical applications, and toxicity effects. International Nano Letters. 2012;2(1).
4. Dakal TC, Kumar A, Majumdar RS, Yadav V. Mechanistic Basis of Antimicrobial Actions of Silver Nanoparticles. Front Microbiol. 2016;7.
5. Zorraquín-Peña I, Cueva C, Bartolomé B, Moreno-Arribas MV. Silver Nanoparticles against Foodborne Bacteria. Effects at Intestinal Level and Health Limitations. Microorganisms. 2020;8(1):132.
6. Pal S, Tak YK, Song JM. Does the Antibacterial Activity of Silver Nanoparticles Depend on the Shape of the Nanoparticle? A Study of the Gram-Negative Bacterium Escherichia coli. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2007;73(6):1712-1720.
7. Durán N, Durán M, de Jesus MB, Seabra AB, Fávaro WJ, Nakazato G. Silver nanoparticles: A new view on mechanistic aspects on antimicrobial activity. Nanomed Nanotechnol Biol Med. 2016;12(3):789-799.
8. Kim JS, Kuk E, Yu KN, Kim J-H, Park SJ, Lee HJ, et al. Corrigendum to “Antimicrobial effects of silver nanoparticles” [Nanomed Nanotechnol Biol Med. 2007;1:95-101]. Nanomed Nanotechnol Biol Med. 2014;10(5):e1119.
9. Lemire JA, Harrison JJ, Turner RJ. Antimicrobial activity of metals: mechanisms, molecular targets and applications. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 2013;11(6):371-384.
10. Ashraf JM, Ansari MA, Khan HM, Alzohairy MA, Choi I. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles and characterization of their inhibitory effects on AGEs formation using biophysical techniques. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1).
11. Farias IAP, Santos CCLd, Sampaio FC. Antimicrobial Activity of Cerium Oxide Nanoparticles on Opportunistic Microorganisms: A Systematic Review. BioMed Research International. 2018;2018:1-14.
12. Applerot G, Lipovsky A, Dror R, Perkas N, Nitzan Y, Lubart R, Gedanken A. Enhanced Antibacterial Activity of Nanocrystalline ZnO Due to Increased ROS-Mediated Cell Injury. Adv Funct Mater. 2009;19(6):842-852.
13. Zarrindokht E-K. Antibacterial activity of ZnO nanoparticle on Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Afr J Microbiol Res. 2012;5(18).
14. Tayel AA, El-Tras WF, Moussa S, El-Baz AF, Mahrous H, Salem MF, Brimer L. Antibacterial action of zinc oxide nanoparticles against foodborne pathogens. J Food Saf. 2011;31(2):211-218.
15. Reddy KM, Feris K, Bell J, Wingett DG, Hanley C, Punnoose A. Selective toxicity of zinc oxide nanoparticles to prokaryotic and eukaryotic systems. Appl Phys Lett. 2007;90(21).
16. Pasquet J, Chevalier Y, Couval E, Bouvier D, Noizet G, Morlière C, Bolzinger M-A. Antimicrobial activity of zinc oxide particles on five micro-organisms of the Challenge Tests related to their physicochemical properties. Int J Pharm. 2014;460(1-2):92-100.
17. Sánchez-López E, Gomes D, Esteruelas G, Bonilla L, Lopez-Machado AL, Galindo R, et al. Metal-Based Nanoparticles as Antimicrobial Agents: An Overview. Nanomaterials. 2020;10(2):292.
18. Habeeb MA, Hamza LA. Structural, Optical and D.C Electrical Properties of (PVA-PVP-Y2O3) Films and Their Application for Humidity Sensor. Journal of Advanced Physics. 2017;6(1):1-9.
19. Sangawar VS, Chikhalikar PS, Dhokne RJ, Ubale AU, Meshram SD. Thermally stimulated discharge conductivity in polymer composite thin films. Bull Mater Sci. 2006;29(4):413-416.
20. The activity levels of Lactate dehydrogenase in the seminal plasma of normospermic and infertile men. Advances In Natural And Applied Sciences. 2018.
21. Antibacterial Activity of Biopolymer Blend- Carbide Nanoparticles Bio-Films against Escherichia Coli. Res J Agric Biol Sci. 2018.
22. Mohammed RM. Effect of Antimony Oxide Nanoparticles on Structural, Optical and AC Electrical Properties of (PEO-PVA) Blend for Antibacterial Applications. International Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering Research. 2020;8(8):4726-4738.
23. Hashim A. Enhanced Structural, Optical, and Electronic Properties of In2O3 and Cr2O3 Nanoparticles Doped Polymer Blend for Flexible Electronics and Potential Applications. Journal of Inorganic and Organometallic Polymers and Materials. 2020;30(10):3894-3906.