Synthesis and Evaluation Biological Activity of Some New Polymers Derived From 3,3’-dimethoxybiphenyl-4,4’-diamine

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Department of Chemistry, College of Education for Pure Science(Ibn Al-Haitham)/University of Baghdad, Iraq

10.22052/JNS.2023.03.026

Abstract

In this study, synthesis of polymer Nanocomposites through the blending of prepared polymers with polyvinyl alcohol (a synthetic polymer) or chitosan (a natural polymer) then mixed with nano oxide silica by many steps. The new compound [I] was obtained via reaction of 3,3’-dimethoxybiphenyl-4,4’-diamine as starting material with malic anhydride in DMF then treatment with ammonium persulfate (NH4)2S2O8 (as the initiator) in order to produce polymer [II]. Also, we prepared new polymers [III-V] by using the same starting material (3,3’-dimethoxybiphenyl-4,4’-diamine) with glutaric acid or adipic acid or isophthalic acid in DMF and pyridine. In this study, new polymer blending [VI-IX] and [X-XIII] were synthesized from a prepared polymer [II-V] mixed with different polymers [polyvinyl alcohol (a synthetic polymer) or chitosan (a natural polymer), respectively. Then it was mixed with silica nanoparticles to produce newly nanocomposites [XIV-XVIII] and study their effect on two types of bacteria then compare with Amoxilline as antibiotic drug. The anticancer activity human breast cancer cell line (MCF-7) of some prepared polymers were also studied and compare with normal cell line Rat Embryonic Fibroblasts(REF).

Keywords


INTRODUCTION

A polymer blend is a mixture of two or more polymers that have been blended jointly to form a new material with various physical properties. Polymer blending has attracted a lot of interest as a simple and low-cost prosperous method of expanding polymeric materials that have fluctuations for commercial implementations. Also, the properties of the blends can be involved in flowing to their end users through the right selection of the component polymers. Polymer blends are materials that are made by blending to create a new substance with complementary properties. Polymer mixing is an appealing strategy for developing new materials for particular uses since it is both cost-effective and simple [1]. Blended polymers are used in medical applications for assessing, addressing and increasing the function of biological systems, as well as replacing organs or tissues that may need to be replaced [2,3]. Polymer nanocomposites are an emerging biomedical technological, agriculture, drug delivery, and biotechnology applications domain showing high- accomplishment materials with individual and innovative characteristics, ideal for many advanced implementations [4]. The final properties of nanocomposites are based on the polymer matrix used , the functional groups, and the size with the shape of the nanofillers , also dispersion into the polymer matrix, interfacial interactions [5]. Due to their applications across a variety of                 fields, like  building blocks in the construction regarding  functionalized            organometallic/organic materials as well as  sensor materials, benzidine  derivatives, like 3,3’-dimethoxybiphenyl-4,4’-diamine , have attracted increasing attention            recently [6-9]. Additionally, benzidine derivatives have made it possible for them to be used in cell biology as staining agents as well as electroactive organic polymeric compounds [10-13].

In this study, new polymer blending was synthesized from a prepared polymer mixed with different polymers [polyvinyl alcohol (a synthetic polymer) or chitosan (a natural polymer). Then it was mixed with silica nanoparticles to produce newly nanocomposites and study their effect on different types of bacteria.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Instrumentation

The FT-IR Spectra have been registered on Shimadzu FT-IR-8400s, ranging between 400-4000cm-1, using the KBr disk. 1H-NMR spectra were carried out by company: Ultra Shield 400MHz, Bruker, University of Tehran-Iran.

 

General procedure methods

In order to obtain newly polymers, we illustrated Figs. 1-3. 

 

Synthesis of 4,4’-((3,3’-dimethoxy-[1,1’-biphenyl]-4,4’-diyl) bis(azanediyl)) bis (4-oxobut-2-enoic acid) compound [I] (14) 

Maleic anhydride (1.96 g, 0.02 mol) and 3,3’-dimethoxybiphenyl-4,4’-diamine (2.44 g, 0.01 mol) were combined in 25 ml of DMF, refluxed for roughly 4 hours, and the viscous byproduct washed with diethyl ether before being dried at room temperature. Yield 90%; Color: pale brown.

 

Synthesis of polymer [II][15]

(0.44 g, 0.001 mol) of compound [I] in (15 mL) of EtOH, then add  0.14 g of ammonium per sulfate (APS) As a polymerization initiator and were combined. The mixture refluxed for around 12 hours after 3 hours of room temperature stirring. To produce the desired product, the mixture was filtered, washed with cold EtOH absolute, dried and recrystallized with ethanol: dietylether (1:2). 

 

Synthesis of polymers [III-V] [16]

3,3’-dimethoxybiphenyl-4,4’-diamine (2.44g, 0.01 mol) has been dissolved in DMF (10mL). with the help of a few drops of dry pyridine .After the mixture had cooled , adipic acid or glutaric acid or isophthalic acid (0.02mol.) were added while stirring. The stirring persisted for a full day. Afterward, the mixture was transferred to ice water along with 5ml of concentrated hydrochloric acid. The precipitous item has dried and been filtered.

 

Synthesis of Polymer Blend [VI-IX] [17]

The polymer blends were prepared from prepared polymer [II-V] blending with polyvinyl alcohol in 5:5: ratio using solvent casting method. PVA was dissolved in the hot water for the purpose of producing 5 wt% solutions of polymer then mix with one of solution of prepared polymers [II-V]. Both solutions of the polymers were mixed and a homogenous solution has been made with the use of hot-plate stirrer for a duration of 60min. 

 

Synthesis of Polymer Blend [X-XIII] [17]

 Polymer blends were produced by using solvent casting method. chitosan dissolved in 2% solution of aqueous acetic acid with the stirring at the temperature of the room, then mix with solution of prepared polymers [II-V] Both solutions of the polymers were mixed and a homogenous solution has been made with the use of hot-plate stirrer for a duration of 60min. polymer [II-V] and chitosan have been done through the mixing of (one ratio) in (5:5).

 

Synthesis of Nanocomposites [XIV-XVIII] [18,19]

100mg of the dried polymers blend [VIII-XII] has been put in 50mL of the silica oxide solution of a 250mg/L concentration as well as 1.5h sonication to bond the silica nano metal in blend matrix by the electro-static force, then the mixture was poured into petri dish.

 

RESULT AND DISCUSSION

The study includes synthesis regarding a series of polymer blending based on 3,3’-dimethoxybi phenyl-4,4’-diamine moiety with different polymers polyvinyl alcohol (synthetic polymer) or chitosan (natural polymer). The final step employs designing of a newer nanocomposite [XIV-XVII] using greener method from polymers blend [VIII-XII] with nano oxide silica by stirring only. The structures of each synthesized compounds have been identified using their spectral data and physical compounds. Compound [1] produce from 3,3’-dimethoxybiphenyl-4,4’-diamine with Maleic anhydride in DMF. Compound [I] was identified by FTIR spectroscopy. The FTIR absorption (υ, cm-1) disappearance (-NH2) group and appearance 1660 cm-1 (C=O-NH), In addition to the peaks: 3400-2400 (OH), 3180 (NH)group, 1693 (C=O) of the carboxylic acid. Polymer [II] was synthesized by the reaction of compound [I] in absolute EtOH by the use of the APS as the initiator. FT-IR spectrum (υ, cm-1): show stretching band that refers to O-H related to COOH moiety in a region 3400-2400, a stretching band regarding N-H group appearing at 3180 , 3035 (C-H aromatic), (2908,2843) of (C-H aliph.) as well as a stretching band to (C=O-NH) and (C=O- COOH) appeared at1651,1685, respectively [20,21].

1H NMR (δ ppm) of polymer [II]: singlet signals at 3.85 ppm due to six protons for two OCH3 groups, -CH=CH chemical shifting is disappeared and show signals at δ (4.35) because of -[CH-CH] n-, (6.90-8.58) ppm that attributed to the eight aromatic protons, 8.59 ppm and 12.07 ppm for a sharp signal could be a result of to 2(NH)and proton of 2(OH) carboxylic group. Polymer [III-V] were synthesized by the reaction of 3,3’-dimethoxybiphenyl-4,4’-diamine with Glutaric acid or Adipic acid or iso phthalic acid in DMF and pyridine, FT-IR spectrum of polymer [IV] show disappearance (-NH2) group and appearance 1660 cm-1 (C=O-NH), 3180 (NH) group, (2958,2877) cm-1 of (C-H aliph.) and 1693 cm-1 of (C=O-OH). 1H NMR (δ ppm) of polymer[V]: a multiple signals at(1.23-1.39)ppm to CH2CH2CH2CH2 , singlet signals at 3.80 ppm due to six protons for two OCH3 groups, triplet signals at (4.30-4.32 ), (4.84-4.80) (due to NH-C=O-CH2 and CH2-C=O respectively , (6.63-7.26) ppm that attributed to the eight aromatic protons, 8.25ppm for a sharp signal could be a result of to 2(NH) (22). Polymer Blend [VI-XIII] were prepared from prepared polymer [II-V] with polyvinyl alcohol or chitosan respectively using solvent casting method. The FT-IR spectrum of polymer [VI] shows a broadening peak in (3600-2400) cm-1 region because of a strong inter-molecular bonding of hydrogen that exists between hydroxyl groups of polymers [II] and PVA’s hydroxyl groups, 1716 cm-1 as a result of (C=O) of ester. FT-IR spectrum of polymer [X] show, the peak broadening in (3600–2400) cm-1 region because of a strong inter-molecular bonding of hydrogen that exists between amino       groups of Chitosan and hydroxyl groups of polymers [II] and 1666 cm-1 as a result of    (C=O-NH)[23,24]. Tables 1, 2 and 3 provide a list of the collective FT-IR spectral data collected for significant compounds.

 

Scanning Electron Microscope Studies (SEM)

The morphology of the surface varies for selected polymer blends [VIII] produce from polymer [IV] blends with polyvinyl alcohol, polymer nanocomposite [XIV] produce from polymer blend [VIII] with nanocomposite (silica oxide) that has been loaded with the silica. Adding PVA imparts roughness to blend membrane and results in the alteration of the blend membrane surface topography and has considerable impact upon the cell spreading. The average size of the particles of polymer [VIII] is ranged between (49-88) nm, Fig. 4.While SEM micrograph of for presence of silica oxide has been noticed to be with the homogenous distributions on the matrix surface. The average nano size of the particles is ranged between (30-46) nm for silica nanoparticles, Fig. 5. The particles in nanocomposite film were found with almost spherical morphology. However, some of the agglomerations of nanoparticles were also found the figures and the surface was somewhat rough [25,26].

 

Biological activity

Biological activities of the selected blended polymer [VIII, XII] produce from polymer [IV] blended with PVA or chitosan, respectively and Polymers nanocomposites [XIV],[XVIII] produce from polymers [VIII,XII] with silica oxide have been tested against two pathogenic bacteria types (G+) Staphylococcus aureus and E. coli (G-), utilizing the diffusion inhibition approach and compare with Amoxilline (Fig. 6). The results of antimicrobial activity are represented in Table 4. The ternary mix polymers blend [VIII, XII] with Si nano composite that was exhibit very good antimicrobial activities when compared with Amoxilline commonly used as antimicrobial agents. Due to an excess of carboxylic groups, which dissociate to leave a negatively charged cell surface, bacteria have a negative surface charge at biological pH levels. Electrostatic forces are responsible for the bioactivity and adhesion regarding bacteria and NPs because of their opposing charges. In comparison to larger particles, NPs have a higher surface area available for interactions, which boosts their ability to have a bactericidal impact. As a result, they cause cytotoxicity in the microorganisms. The amount of surface area that the NPs had an impact on their antibacterial qualities. Greater antibacterial activity is exhibited by smaller particles with a higher surface to volume ratio [27,28].

Anticancer activity          

Cell lines were prepared for cytotoxicity assay [29] by using cultured cells (96 Wells) in a micro titer plate. The absorbance was measured at (620 nm) on a micro plate reader. The anticancer activity of various concentrations of some nanocomposites were investigated against human breast cancer cell line (MCF-7) and Rat Embryonic Fibroblasts (REF)   revealing a good activity, which had no effect on the growth of normal Rat Embryonic Fibroblasts. Calculated cell growth inhibition rate granted to equations [30]:

The nanocomposites [XIV],[XVIII] exhibit good inhibition  in concentration (12.5,25, 50) µg/ml . SiNPs can induce cytotoxicity through increase the ROS level, generating damage to cellular components through intracellular oxidative stress  

 

CONCLUSION 

Polymer blending based on 3,3’-dimethoxybi phenyl-4,4’-diamine were prepared with different polymers [polyvinyl alcohol (synthetic polymer) or chitosan (natural polymer). Then Nanocomposites were designed from polymers blending with silica nanoparticles             (SiNPs)  in very good yield. Numerous antibacterial activities were found in synthesized Nanocomposites polymers. Significant antibacterial activities against E. coli and S. aureus were seen in vitro for [XIV] , [XVIII], then study anticancer activity human breast cancer cell line (MCF-7) of and compare with normal cell line Rat Embryonic Fibroblasts(REF) for nanocomposities [XIV] , [XVIII]; this may be due to the existence of Nano silica with -amide groups in its composition. As a result, more biological analysis and cutting-edge research are anticipated to show them to be extremely attractive lead and parent compounds regarding the synthesis and design of novel pharmaceutical medications.

 

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this manuscript.

 

 

 
REFERENCES