Document Type : Research Paper
Authors
1 Department of Chemistry, Alzahra University, Vanak Square, Tehran, Iran
2 School of Chemistry, College of Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Keywords
INTRODUCTION
Phosphorescent organic light emitting diodes have attracted tremendous attention among the scientists due to their excessive potential in both solid-state lighting and flat-panel presentations. Some of phosphorescent organic compounds are blue organic emitters, although a few of them can be used in organic lighting emitting diodes (OLEDs) [1]. Tri- and tetra-substituted imidazoles [2], especially phenanthro[9,10-d]imidazole derivatives exhibit good electron injection and transport ability, high luminance intensity, therefore, they are good candidates for OLEDs [3]. Because of their industrial applications, introducing an economical synthetic procedure is essential for preparation of phenanthro[9,10-d]imidazole derivatives [4].
So far, a few methods were published for the synthesis of phenanthro[9,10-d]imidazole derivatives; Jawaharmal and coworkers performed the synthesis in glacial acetic acid as solvent within 3 h [5] while Mukhopadhyay used mercaptopropylsilica (MPS) used as a catalyst in a mixture of water and methanol [6]. In many publications, phenanthro[9,10-d]imidazole derivatives were prepared and used as the intermediate for the synthesis of modified electroluminescent materials or OLED [7-12].
After discovering the Santa Barbara Amorphous (SBA-15) by Zhao and coworkers [13], it was extensively used as a good substrate for loading drugs [14], organic compounds [15, 16], and metal cations [17]. The modified SBA-15 can be used in different fields of research such as catalysis [18-20], detection of heavy metals [21, 22], absorption [23-25], and so on. Sulfonic acid functionalized SBA-15 (SBA-Pr-SO3H), as a heterogeneous solid acid catalyst, has been applied in several one-pot syntheses [26, 27]. Therefore, herein we want to report the role of SBA-Pr-SO3H as a highly efficient heterogeneous acid catalyst in the efficient synthesis of phenanthro[9,10-d]imidazole derivatives via a one-pot four-component reaction.
EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
The chemicals employed in this work were obtained from Merck Company and used with no purifications. Infrared (IR) spectra were recorded on KBr disks using a FT-IR Bruker Tensor 27 instrument. Melting points of the products were measured by using the capillary tube method with an Electro thermal 9200 apparatus. The 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra were obtained by the use of a Bruker 250 MHz and 62.5 MHz, respectively, in either DMSO-d6 or CDCl3 solution. Mass spectra data were achieved by using a Network mass selective detector 5973 (Agilent) instrument.
Preparation of SBA-Pr-SO3H
SBA-15 was prepared according to the previously published article [13]. Afterward, in order to functionalizing it, the calcined SBA-15 (2 g) and (3-mercaptopropyl)trimethoxysilane (10 mL) were treated together under reflux condition in dry toluene (20 mL) for 24 h. Subsequently, the mixture was filtered off and the obtained solid washed well with dichloromethane for 6 h using a soxhlet apparatus, and then dried under reduced pressure. The obtained crude SBA-Pr-SH was oxidized using excess amount of hydrogen peroxide solution in methanol (20 mL) in the presence of H2SO4 (1 drop) at room temperature overnight. The mixture was filtered and washed with water and acetone. The modified SBA-Pr-SO3H was dried and characterized using TGA, XRD, SEM and TEM.
General procedure for the synthesis of phenanthro [9,10-d]imidazole derivatives 5(a–g)
A mixture of 9,10-phenanthraquinone (0.20 g, 1 mmol), aromatic aldehyde (1 mmol), aniline derivative (1.5 mmol), ammonium acetate (0.31 g, 4 mmol), and SBA-Pr-SO3H (0.02 g) was stirred in refluxing acetic acid (3 mL) for about 5-20 min. After completion of the reaction which was traced by TLC technique, acetic acid was evaporated and the crude product was dissolved in ethanol and DMF. Afterward, the solution was filtered for removal of the heterogeneous catalyst, and the filtrate was cooled to afford the pure product. The catalyst was washed subsequently with a diluted acidic solution, distilled water, and then acetone, and then dried under reduced pressure and reused for several times without significant loss of catalytic activity. The physical and spectroscopic data for the new compounds are given below.
4-(1-phenyl-1H-phenanthro[9,10-d]imidazol-2-yl)phenol (5e)
M.P. > 300 C°, FT-IR (KBr) ν (cm-1): 3050, 2595, 1893, 1603, 1444, 1389, 1346, 1250, 1166, 1040, 835, 739, 615, 533, 428. 1H NMR (250 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 6.70 (d, 2H, J=8.2 Hz, ArH), 7.04 (d, 1H, J=8 Hz, ArH), 7.27-7.73 (m, 9H, ArH), 7.37 (d, 2H, J=8.2 Hz, ArH), 8.66 (d, 1H, J=7.7 Hz, ArH), 8.79-8.87 (m, 2H, ArH). 13C NMR (62.5 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 115.4, 120.5, 121.4, 122.5, 122.9, 124, 124.8, 125.4, 126, 127, 127.1, 127.8, 128, 128.7, 129.6, 130.5, 130.7, 131.1, 136.8, 138.8, 151.5, 158.5. Mass m/z (%): 386 (M+, 40), 119 (53), 91 (43), 77 (80), 55 (87), 41 (100).
2-(3-nitrophenyl)-1-phenyl-1H-phenanthro-[9,10-d]imidazole (5f)
M.P. 233-235 C°, IR (KBr) ν (cm-1): 3049, 1809, 1671, 1587, 1521, 1451, 1380, 1336, 1150, 1079, 1035, 986, 913, 799, 755, 706, 527. 1H NMR (250 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm): 7.16-7.77 (m, 11H, ArH), 7.96 (d, 1H, J=7.7 Hz, ArH), 8.09 (d, 1H, J=7.7 Hz, ArH), 8.35 (s, 1H, ArH), 8.67 (d, 1H, J=8 Hz, ArH), 8.74 (d, 1H, J=8.5 Hz, ArH), 8.85 (d, 1H, J=8 Hz, ArH). 13C NMR (62.5 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm): 120.9, 122.7, 122.8, 123.2, 123.7, 124.1, 125.3, 125.9, 126.4, 127, 127.4, 128.4, 128.9, 129.2, 129.6, 130.4, 130.6, 132.1, 134.7, 137.5, 138.2, 147.9, 148. Mass m/z (%): 415 (M+, 3), 324 (100), 265 (89), 237 (89), 192 (80), 43 (78).
2-(2,4-dimethoxyphenyl)-1-phenyl-1H-phenanthro[9,10-d]imidazole (5g)
M.P. 213-215 C°, IR (KBr) ν (cm-1): 3010, 2941, 2832, 2588, 1945, 1612, 1579, 1527, 1461, 1378, 1295, 1202, 1158, 1115, 1031, 916, 833, 800, 750, 691, 622, 532, 426. 1H NMR (250 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm): 3.5 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.77 (s, 3H, CH3), 6.28 (s, 1H, ArH), 6.49 (d, 1H, J=8.2 Hz, ArH), 7.27 (s, 1H, ArH), 7.41-7.44 (m, 7H, ArH), 7.59-7.74 (m, 3H, ArH), 8.70 (d, 1H, J=8 Hz, ArH), 8.75 (d, 1H, J=8.5 Hz, ArH), 8.88 (d, 1H, J=7.7 Hz, ArH). 13C NMR (62.5 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm): 54.9, 55.3, 98.1, 104.4, 112.9, 120.9, 122.8, 123, 124, 124.7, 125.3, 126.1, 127.1, 127.4, 128.1, 128.6, 128.8, 128.9, 133.2, 137.4, 138.4, 150, 158.7, 162.1. Mass m/z (%): 430 (M+, 100), 399 (46), 353 (27), 267 (79), 190 (77), 163 (90), 77 (78).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
In this paper, a series of tetrasubstituted imidazoles named as phenanthro[9,10-d]imidazole were prepared through a one-pot four-component reaction of 9,10-phenanthraquinone 1, aromatic aldehyde 2, aniline 3, and ammonium acetate 4 using SBA-Pr-SO3H as a nanoporous solid acid catalyst (Fig. 1). At first, in order to modify the reaction conditions, different environments were tested including solvent-free system at ambient temperature and 120 °C, refluxing in water, ethanol and/or acetic acid as green solvents. As shown in Table 1, the best result was obtained under refluxing in acetic acid in the presence of SBA-Pr-SO3H (0.02 g) with excellent yield of the product. To investigate the effect of catalyst, this reaction was tested under modified conditions in the absence of SBA-Pr-SO3H; the results showed that SBA-Pr-SO3H can catalyze the reaction in a shorter time with high yield of the product. After this, to study the generality of this process, several aromatic aldehydes were applied for the synthesis of other phenanthro[9,10-d]imidazole derivatives as shown results in Table 2. Except compounds 5c and 5g, all the other products were obtained in high yields by varying the reaction time in the range of 5-20 min. The low efficiency of products 5c and 5g perhaps is owing to the side reaction which likely occurs in p-anisaldehyde stains [28] in which methoxy substituted benzaldehydes can form a triarylmethane dye in the presence of acetic acid under acidic media.
In order to understand the effect of SBA-Pr-SO3H as catalyst in this reaction, the reaction conditions of present methodology were compared with some other published methods [5, 6, 29, 30] and summarized in Table 3 (Entries 2 and 3). As it is clear, the safe and green SBA-Pr-SO3H catalyzed and accelerated the reaction more efficiently to give the higher yield of product within shorter reaction time.
The proposed mechanism is shown in Fig. 2. Firstly, the carbonyl group of aromatic aldehyde is protonated by the solid acid catalyst. Then, a nucleophilic attack of ammonia, produced by ammonium acetate, and then aniline to the activated carbonyl group of compound 6 gives intermediate 8. Condensation of 9,10-phenanthraquinone 1 with intermediate 8 through an imination process produces compound 9 which is cyclized by addition of the second amine group. Finally, after a dehydration process, the desired product 5 is obtained.
Preparation and Characterization of SBA-Pr-SO3H
SBA-Pr-SO3H was prepared as mentioned in experimental section, and then, characterized. The TGA curve of SBA-Pr-SO3H is shown in Fig. 3. According to the weight reduction in the temperature range between 200-600 °C (about 20% mass loss), the amount of propyl sulfonic acid groups was calculated as 1.2 mmol/g. In addition, using back titration method, concentration of sulfonic acid functional groups onto the pores of SBA-Pr-SO3H was estimated through addition of a very dilute standardized NaOH solution (0.1 M). The excess amount of NaOH was titrated with a standardized HCl. The obtained data showed that each grams of SBA-Pr-SO3H contains 1.28 mmol sulfonic acid functional groups. Good agreement between both values obtained by back titration and TGA shows that the SO3H groups were incorporated onto the internal surface of SBA-15.
The small angle powder XRD pattern of both SBA-15 and SBA-Pr-SO3H (Fig. 4) display the three characteristic peaks at the 2θ (°) values of 1.00, 1.69 and 1.93 which are corresponded to the 100 (strong), 110 (weak) and 200 (weak) reflections, respectively. Such pattern confirms the 2D-hexagonal structure of mesoporous compounds. Although, a considerable decrease is detected in the intensity of SBA-Pr-SO3H which is due to grafting the propyl-SO3H groups onto the pores of SBA-15.
SEM image of SBA-Pr-SO3H (Fig. 5-Left) displays uniform particles about 700-900 nm. The same morphology was previously observed for SBA-15. It can be concluded that during the modification procedure, the morphology of SBA-15 framework was saved without any changes. Besides this, the TEM image (Fig. 5-Right) demonstrates the parallel channels, which resemble the pores configuration of SBA-15. This confirms that the pore of SBA-Pr-SO3H was not collapsed during two steps modification.
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, in this research the importance of phenanthro[9,10-d]imidazole for OLED technology was shown. Then, SBA-Pr-SO3H was used as a mesoporous solid acid catalyst in the synthesis of phenanthro[9,10-d]imidazole derivatives through a one pot four-component reaction of 9,10-phenanthraquinone, aromatic aldehydes, aniline derivatives and ammonium acetate in refluxing acetic acid. Short reaction time, good yield and easy isolation of the products are the advantages of this method and therefore, phenanthro[9,10-d]imidazole synthesis was improved by the use of an efficient catalyst.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the Research Council of Alzahra University and the University of Tehran.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this manuscript.