Journal of Nanostructures

Journal of Nanostructures

Co-precipitation Synthesis of Cu0.25Zn0.75Cr2O4 Nanoparticles as an Efficient Visible Light Photocatalyst for Degradation of Methylene Blue Dye

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors
1 Ministry of Education, General Directorate of Education, AL-Karkh the Second, Iraq
2 Chemistry Department, College of Science, Anbar University, Iraq
3 College of Nursing, university of Al-Ameed, Iraq
4 Department of Chemistry, Collage of Education for Pure Science, University of Kerbala Iraq
5 Centre for Research on Environment and Renewable Energy, University of Kerbala, Karbala, 56001, Iraq
6 Department of Therapeutic Nutrition Technologies, Al Taff University College, 56001, Kerbala, Iraq
7 Department of Basic Sciences, College of Dentistry, University of Kerbala, 56001, Karbala, Iraq
10.22052/JNS.2026.02.078
Abstract
Photocatalytic removal of organic pollutants requires an efficient photocatalyst of operating under visible light irradiation. In this work, synthesis of Cu0.25Zn0.75Cr2O4 nanoparticles (CZCO) was reported using the facile co-precipitation method. The CZCO nanoparticles exhibited a cubic phase with an average crystallite size of about 14.61 nm. Also, Field emission electron microscopy (FESEM) analysis confirmed a nanospherical morphology with particle sizes below 50 nm. The nanoparticles showed a strong visible light absorption with an optical band gap of 2.47 eV. The photocatalytic performance was examined by degradation of an aqueous solution of methylene blue (MB). More than 92% of the MB solution was degraded using 0.04 g of the nanoparticles under visible-light irradiation for 180 min. Studying of key parameters, including pH of MB solution and concentration of H2O2 oxidants, showed that alkaline dye solution (pH = 9) and 0.02 molar of oxidant enhanced the degradation efficiency to 95% and 99%, respectively. Furthermore, recyclability tests over six successive reaction cycles demonstrated the good reusability and structural stability of the synthesized CZCO nanoparticles.
Keywords

INTRODUCTION 
In the 21st century, the development of practical approaches for removing of contaminants from water resources has become essential [1, 2]. The scarcity of clean and hygienic water has intensified over recent decades due to increasing industrial and agricultural activities [3, 4]. Consequently, environmentally sustainable wastewater treatment methods that generate fewer toxic by-products, exhibit higher efficiency, and operate at lower operational costs are receiving increasing attention [5, 6]. 
Among advanced treatment technologies, photocatalysis has introduced a revolutionary approach in water purification, owing to its potential capabilities for removing organic and inorganic pollutants form water media [7, 8]. Photocatalytic reactions exploit a renewable energy source—sunlight—to activate a photocatalyst material having a band gap associated with the energy of incident light [9, 10]. 
Although numerous materials have been investigated as photocatalysts, only a limited compounds demonstrate efficient activity under visible light irradiation [11]. Most photocatalysts suffer from low quantum efficiency due to the fast recombination of the photogenerated electrons and holes [12]. In order to enable photocatalysts to function effectively under the visible light, several strategies have been suggested, including incorporation of impurities (metallic or non-metallic ions) into crystalline structure of the photocatalysts [9, 13], combination of two or more photocatalyst materials [14, 15], and coupling photocatalysts with carbon nanomaterials [16, 17].
In this regard, many works have been published in literature relating to removal of contaminants using the visible-light photocatalysts. For example, Rahbar et al. introduced the photocatalytic system comprising Fe, and B co-doped TiO2/CNT@WO3 for treating the petrochemical wastewater under natural sunlight irradiation [18]. Derkaoui et al. reported MnCo2O4 spinel as the visible-light photocatalyst for removing rhodamine B [19]. Prasad et al. reported visible-light degradation of methylene blue using synthesized Cu doped triphasic TiO2 [20]. In addition, Z-scheme Cu2O@Ag/g-C3N4 heterojunctions was reported for the visible-light photocatalytic degradation of tetracycline [21].
In this work, we have synthesized Cu0.25Zn0.75Cr2O4 nanoparticles using facile and straightforward co-precipitation reaction. Co-precipitation method is recognized as simple and cost-effective synthetic route for preparation of fine metal oxide and mixed metal oxide nanoparticles [22, 23]. The Cu0.25Zn0.75Cr2O4 nanoparticles (CZCO), as a mixed metal oxide compound, consist of three transition metal oxides that synergistically encourage the photocatalytic activity by facilitating electronic transitions between energy levels of the components. For instance, Ahmed et al. suggested that the electron transfer from TiO2 conduction band to conduction band of Cr2O3 prolongs the lifetime of the electron/hole pairs, and thereby increasing the photocatalytic activity [24].  
Herein, the visible-light photocatalytic capacity of the nanoparticles was assessed by diffuse reflectance spectroscopy. The visible-light photo-efficiency of the CZCO nanoparticles was studied for removal of methylene blue (MB). Some influencing factors, including pH of MB solution, loaded amount of CZCO nanoparticles, and concentration of oxidant agent (H2O2), on the photocatalytic efficiency of the CZCO nanoparticles were carefully investigated.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Synthesis of Cu0.25Zn0.75Cr2O4 nanoparticles (CZCO)
The Cu0.25Zn0.75Cr2O4 nanoparticles were synthesized via co-precipitation reaction, as following: Initially, 1.0 g of polypropylene glycol (PPG), serving as a capping agent, was dissolved in 50 mL of deionized water. Subsequently, 0.25 mmol of Cu(NO3)2.3H2O, 0.75 mmol of Zn(NO3)2.6H2O, and 2 mmol of Cr(NO3)3.9H2O were introduced into the solution, followed by continuous stirring for 30 min. Next, pH of the solution was set to around 9 by adding NH4OH solution (0.1 M), and stirring was continued for 30 min. The precipitated solid was collected by centrifugation at 5000 rpm for 15 min and subsequently rinsed twice with a 10% (V/V) ethanol/deionized mixture. The product was then subjected to oven drying at 100 °C for 5 h. finally, the product was calcined at 600 °C for 5 h to form the pure and crystalline brown powder. 

 

Characterization 
Crystallinity of the synthesized CZCO nanoparticles was investigated using X-ray diffraction pattern by Philips diffractometer Pro MPD at 2ϴ= 10°-80°. Surface properties of the CZCO nanoparticles were studied using field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) by TESCAN MIRA 3. Optical properties of the CZCO nanoparticles were studied using diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) (JASCO V-670).

 

Photocatalytic experiments
To investigate the visible light photocatalytic activity of the synthesized CZCO nanoparticles, the degradation of methylene blue (MB) in aqueous solution was selected as the model reaction. The visible light irradiance was supplied using a white color LED lamp (50 W). 
Different amounts of the nanoparticles (0.02, 0.04, and 0.06 g) were used to conduct the photocatalytic reaction for degradation of constant concentration of MB solution (50 ppm). To obtain the higher photocatalytic efficiency, reaching an adsorption/desorption equilibrium between the MB molecules and CZCO nanoparticles is imperative. Hence, the photocatalytic reaction was firstly carried out in the darkness under continuous stirring for 30 min to achieve this goal. Then, the photocatalytic process was initiated under the visible light irradiation for 180 min. The photocatalytic degradation efficiency of MB was determined at 30-min intervals by recording the UV/Vis absorption spectra at its characteristic maximum absorption wavelength of 664 nm.

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Structure and morphology
The crystallinity of the CZCO nanoparticles was studied using the XRD pattern, shown in Fig. 1. The observed diffraction peaks at 2ϴ  values of 18.4°, 30.3°, 35.7°, 37.4°, 43.4°, 47.6°, 53.9°, 57.5°, 63.1°, 66.4°, 67.4V, 71.6°, 74.7°, 75.7° are in agreement with the reported reflections for the cubic structure of chromium copper zinc oxide (JCPDS file no 01-076-1566). Since the synthesized CZCO nanoparticles crystalized in the cubic structure (a = b = c; α = β = γ = 90°), the lattice constant (a) was calculated to be 8.24 Å using following equation (Eq. 1):

, where d is the interplanar space, a is lattice constant, and h, k, l are miler indices.  
Also, the average size of the crystallites was determined using the Scherrer equation [25], which was found to be around 14.61 nm.
The FESEM micrograph in Fig. 2a displays the spherical structure of the CZCO nanoparticles, with an average particle size below 50 nm. Additionally, the nanoparticles were elementally investigated using the EDX spectroscopy (Fig. 2b), which was revealed that the synthesized nanoparticles are consisted of Cu (5.39 wt%), Zn (20.25 wt%), Cr (45.21 wt%), and O (29.15 wt%).


Optical properties
The UV/Vis spectrum of the CZCO nanoparticles was depicted in Fig. 3, confirming that the CZCO nanoparticles possess the noticeable absorption in the visible region. Also, the calculated optical band gap using the Tauc method [26] was depicted in the inset to the Fig. 3. The optical band gap value (2.47 eV) clearly confirms the capacity of the synthesized CZCO nanoparticles to act as the efficient visible light photocatalyst. This results reveals that the interactions of different energy levels of different metal oxides can significantly enhance the visible-light sensitivity and increase the photocatalytic efficiency [27-29].


Photocatalytic experiments
The photocatalytic removal of the MB solution using various dosages of the CZCO nanoparticles (0.02, 0.04, and 0.06 g) was presented in Fig. 4a. As can be seen, the highest degradation level (92.7%) of the MB solution was achieved with 0.04 g of the photocatalyst. However, the degradation efficiency decreased to 83.4% using 0.06 g of the synthesized photocatalyst. This can be explained by the excessive cloudiness of the suspension, which limits light transmission through the solution [30-32]. In addition, UV/Vis spectra of the degraded MB solution under different irradiation time in the presence of the 0.04 g of the CZCO nanoparticles was shown in Fig. 4b.  The absorption of the MB solution markedly decreased after 180 min visible-light illumination upon 0.04 g of the photocatalyst.

 

Effect of pH of MB solution
To study the dependence of the photocatalytic activity on the pH of the MB solution, the degradation reactions were conducted under different pH conditions, including 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11. As shown in Fig. 5, the MB solution is degraded to more than 95.2% at the pH of 9. However, the photocatalytic efficiency decreased to 71.4% at the pH of 11. Moreover, the photocatalytic degradation level under acidic conditions is not as high as the alkaline conditions. So that, the MB solution was degraded only to 49.7% at the pH of 3. To reason these observations, it can be concluded that the MB solution, as a cationic dye [33, 34], has the great tendency to attract onto the negatively charged CZCO surface at alkaline condition (pH = 9). As the photocatalytic process is a surface-dependent reaction, increased adsorption of dye molecules facilitates greater photocatalytic efficiency. Because of the photocatalytic reaction primarily occurs at the photocatalyst-solution interface, higher adsorption rates directly promote better performance [35].

 

Effect of H2O2 
The photoactivity of the CZCO nanoparticles was evaluated in the presence of different concentrations of H2O2 as an oxidant agent (0.01, 0.02, 0.03 M), as shown in Fig. 6. As can be seen, the MB solution is completely degraded using 1 mL of H2O2 (0.02 M). However, increasing the H2O2 concentration to 0.03 M led to the significant decline (73.9%) in the removal efficiency. These results confirm that the addition of proper amount of the H2O2 enhances the production of reactive radicals during the photocatalytic reaction [36]. Nevertheless, at concentrations exceeding the optimal level, the photocatalytic performance decreases due to the scavenging of the radicals by excess H2O2 [37].

 

Recyclability experiments
Fig. 7 shows the recyclability of the synthesized CZCO nanoparticles for the degradation of MB solution. The reactions were repeated over 6 successive cycles under constant experimental conditions. After each cycle, the photocatalyst particles were recovered by centrifugation at 7000 rpm for 15 min. The collected nanoparticles were subsequently rinsed with the 10% (V/V) ethanol/deionized water solution, followed by drying at 90 °C for 5 h in an oven. 
As seen in Fig. 7, the synthesized CZCO photocatalyst exhibits the great recyclability over 6 reaction cycles, confirming the insignificant decline in the photocatalytic activity. Notably, the photocatalytic degradation level of the MB solution remained almost constant after 4th reaction, and the decrement in the efficiency was only about 2.28 % after 6th reaction. This noticeable recyclability can be explained by the structural stability of the CZCO nanoparticles, which was confirmed by providing the XRD patterns for the pristine and reused CZCO nanoparticles. As seen in Fig. 8, no evident changes are observed in the XRD patterns for the CZCO nanoparticles used in the 6 consecutive reaction cycles compared to the pristine nanoparticles. 


CONCLUSION
The Cu0.25Zn0.75Cr2O4 nanoparticles (CZCO) were successfully synthesized using simple co-precipitation reaction. The FESEM image confirmed the formation of nano-sized spherical particles. Through the optical examination using DRS spectroscopy, it was found that the band gap of the CZCO nanoparticles is in the range of the visible light. Therefore, the visible-light photoactivity was suggested for the CZCO photocatalyst. The photocatalyst activity of the CZCO nanoparticles was studied using degradation of the MB solution under visible-light irradiation from the LED lamp (50 W) for 180 min. It was observed that over 92% of the MB solution was degraded using 0.04 g of the synthesized photocatalyst. Furthermore, the enhancement of the degradation level was achieved under alkaline condition (pH = 9) and addition of 0.02 M of H2O2 oxidant. Additionally, the CZCO nanoparticles possessed the high structural stability which reflected in the recyclability experiments, showing the insignificant decrement in the photocatalytic activity after 6 successive reaction cycles.

 

CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this manuscript.

 

1. Sharma N, Singh A, Batra N. Modern and Emerging Methods of Wastewater Treatment. EcoWISE: Springer Singapore; 2018. p. 223-247. 
2. Wang Z, Wang B, Zhang L, Li J. Study on the synthesis of multi-walled carbon nanotube-supported La-N Co-Doped TiO2 and its coupled photocatalytic degradation of rhodamine B (RhB). J Sol-Gel Sci Technol. 2026;117(1).
3. Singh D, Khan F, Jain VK, Bhattacharya S. Enhanced Photocatalytic Activity of Sol–Gel Derived Ruthenium-Doped Titanium Dioxide (Ru@TiO2) Photocatalyst for the Degradation of Two Hazardous Dyes. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution. 2026;237(8).
4. Hadi AA, Mahdi NM, Omran TZ, Zorah M, Naser HA, Alsailawi HA, et al. Toxicity of Silver Nanoparticles and its Relationship to their Source: A Comparison Between Biological and Chemical Synthesis. BioNanoScience. 2026;16(4).
5. Yong ZY, Othman MHD, Yong EL, Puteh MH, Jaafar J, Rahman MA, et al. Global Occurrence, Health Risks, and Treatment Challenges of PFAS in Wastewater: Prospects for Photocatalytic Membrane Technologies. International Journal of Environmental Research. 2026;20(1).
6. Liu H, Song M. Techno-Economic Assessment and Process Design Considerations for Industrial-Scale Photocatalytic Wastewater Treatment. Water. 2026;18(2):221.
7. Pang AL, Arsad A, Ahmad Zaini MA, Garg R, Saqlain Iqbal M, Pal U, et al. A comprehensive review on photocatalytic removal of heavy metal ions by polyaniline-based nanocomposites. Chem Eng Commun. 2023;211(2):275-299.
8. Oladipo AA. CuCr2O4@CaFe–LDO photocatalyst for remarkable removal of COD from high-strength olive mill wastewater. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 2021;591:193-202.
9. Daghrir R, Drogui P, Robert D. Modified TiO2 For Environmental Photocatalytic Applications: A Review. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research. 2013;52(10):3581-3599.
10. Schneider J, Matsuoka M, Takeuchi M, Zhang J, Horiuchi Y, Anpo M, et al. Understanding TiO2 Photocatalysis: Mechanisms and Materials. Chem Rev. 2014;114(19):9919-9986.
11. Ahmad I, Shukrullah S, Naz MY, Ahmed E, Ahmad M, Obaidullah AJ, et al. An aimed review of current advances, challenges, and future perspectives of TiO2-based S-scheme heterojunction photocatalysts. Mater Sci Semicond Process. 2024;172:108088.
12. Morshedy AS, El-Fawal EM, Zaki T, El-Zahhar AA, Alghamdi MM, El Naggar AMA. A review on heterogeneous photocatalytic materials: Mechanism, perspectives, and environmental and energy sustainability applications. Inorg Chem Commun. 2024;163:112307.
13. Lu N, Quan X, Li J, Chen S, Yu H, Chen G. Fabrication of Boron-Doped TiO2 Nanotube Array Electrode and Investigation of Its Photoelectrochemical Capability. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2007;111(32):11836-11842.
14. Ghamarpoor R, Fallah A, Jamshidi M. A Review of Synthesis Methods, Modifications, and Mechanisms of ZnO/TiO2-Based Photocatalysts for Photodegradation of Contaminants. ACS Omega. 2024;9(24):25457-25492.
15. Muñoz-Batista MJ, Gómez-Cerezo MN, Kubacka A, Tudela D, Fernández-García M. Role of Interface Contact in CeO2–TiO2 Photocatalytic Composite Materials. ACS Catalysis. 2013;4(1):63-72.
16. Ardani MR, Pang AL, Pal U, Haniff MASM, Ismail AG, Hamzah AA, et al. Ultrasonic-assisted of TiO2-MWCNT nanocomposite with advanced photocatalytic efficiency for elimination of dye pollutions. Diamond Relat Mater. 2023;137:110066.
17. Iqbal MS, Aslam AA, Iftikhar R, Junaid M, Imran SM, Nazir MS, et al. The potential of functionalized graphene-based composites for removing heavy metals and organic pollutants. Journal of Water Process Engineering. 2023;53:103809.
18. Rahbar M, Hosseini-Sarvari M. Natural sunlight-driven photocatalytic mineralization of petrochemical wastewater using ceramic-supported Fe, B co-doped TiO2/CNT@WO3 in a flat panel photoreactor. Journal of Water Process Engineering. 2025;77:108328.
19. Derkaoui K, Kaci MM, Bencherifa I, Elfiad A, Belkhettab I, Boukhouidem K, et al. MnCo2O4 spinel: a novel visible light photocatalyst for efficient removing Rhodamine B. Opt Mater. 2026;173:117861.
20. P.V MP, Cheruku R, Srivatsava A, Kambila VK, Rao MVH. Cu-doped triphasic TiO2 nanocrystalline materials for enhanced visible light photocatalytic activity. Materials Science and Engineering: B. 2026;326:119197.
21. Ma B, Liu Y, Zhao W, Wu Y, Wan X, Zhao H, et al. Novel Z-Scheme Cu2O@Ag/G-C3N4 Heterojunctions: Integrating Ultrasensitive Sers Detection with Superior Visible-Light Photocatalysis for Tetracycline Elimination. Elsevier BV; 2025. 
22. Patil S, Jagadale S. Co-precipitation methods for the synthesis of metal oxide nanostructures. Solution Methods for Metal Oxide Nanostructures: Elsevier; 2023. p. 39-60. 
23. Aphesteguy JC, Kurlyandskaya GV, de Celis JP, Safronov AP, Schegoleva NN. Magnetite nanoparticles prepared by co-precipitation method in different conditions. Materials Chemistry and Physics. 2015;161:243-249.
24. Ahmed MA, Abou-Gamra ZM, Salem AM. Photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue dye over novel spherical mesoporous Cr2O3/TiO2 nanoparticles prepared by sol-gel using octadecylamine template. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering. 2017;5(5):4251-4261.
25. Holder CF, Schaak RE. Tutorial on Powder X-ray Diffraction for Characterizing Nanoscale Materials. ACS Nano. 2019;13(7):7359-7365.
26. Jubu PR, Obaseki OS, Ajayi DI, Danladi E, Chahrour KM, Muhammad A, et al. Considerations about the determination of optical bandgap from diffuse reflectance spectroscopy using the tauc plot. Journal of Optics. 2024;53(5):5054-5064.
27. Zhang H, Chen G, Bahnemann DW. Photoelectrocatalytic materials for environmental applications. J Mater Chem. 2009;19(29):5089.
28. Ouyang J, Chang M, Zhang Y, Li X. CdSe-sensitized TiO2 nanotube array film fabricated by ultrasonic-assisted electrochemical deposition and subsequently wrapped with TiO2 thin layer for the visible light photoelectrocatalysis. Thin Solid Films. 2012;520(7):2994-2999.
29. Abed SH, Shamkhi AF, Heydaryan K, Mohammadalizadeh M, Sajadi SM. Sol-gel Pechini preparation of CuEr2TiO6 nanoparticles as highly efficient photocatalyst for visible light degradation of acid red 88. Ceram Int. 2024;50(13):24096-24102.
30. Rahbar M, Behrooz TB, Ahmed SM, Khojasteh H. Mn-, Co-, Cu-, and Cd-substituted Ti2(PO4)3 nanoparticles: optical, magnetic, and photocatalytic properties. New J Chem. 2026;50(2):686-698.
31. Mudhafar M, Zainol I, Ameer AJ, Abd MY, Alsailawi HA, Ghazaly NM, et al. Corrigendum to “The effect of fish collagen on the silver nanoparticles sizes and shapes using modified microwave-assisted green synthesis method and their antibacterial activities” [Heliyon Volume 10, Issue 12, June 2024, Article e32837]. Heliyon. 2025;11(15):e43915.
32. Sathish Kumar PS, Sivakumar R, Anandan S, Madhavan J, Maruthamuthu P, Ashokkumar M. Photocatalytic degradation of Acid Red 88 using Au–TiO2 nanoparticles in aqueous solutions. Water Res. 2008;42(19):4878-4884.
33. Azeez F, Al-Hetlani E, Arafa M, Abdelmonem Y, Nazeer AA, Amin MO, et al. The effect of surface charge on photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue dye using chargeable titania nanoparticles. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1).
34. Trandafilović LV, Jovanović DJ, Zhang X, Ptasińska S, Dramićanin MD. Enhanced photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue and methyl orange by ZnO:Eu nanoparticles. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2017;203:740-752.
35. Waghchaure RH, Adole VA, Jagdale BS. Photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue, rhodamine B, methyl orange and Eriochrome black T dyes by modified ZnO nanocatalysts: A concise review. Inorg Chem Commun. 2022;143:109764.
36. Gaya UI, Abdullah AH. Heterogeneous photocatalytic degradation of organic contaminants over titanium dioxide: A review of fundamentals, progress and problems. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology C: Photochemistry Reviews. 2008;9(1):1-12.
37. Wang Y, Hong C-s. Effect of hydrogen peroxide, periodate and persulfate on photocatalysis of 2-chlorobiphenyl in aqueous TiO2 suspensions. Water Res. 1999;33(9):2031-2036.
38. Kadhim MM, Sead FF, Jalil AT, Taban TZ, Rheima AM, Almashhadani HA, et al. Al-, Ga-, and In-decorated BP nanotubes as chemical sensors for 2-chloroethanol. Monatshefte für Chemie - Chemical Monthly. 2022;153(7-8):589-596.