<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Kashan</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Nanostructures</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2251-7871</Issn>
				<Volume>13</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2023</Year>
					<Month>04</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Influence of Various Polishing Systems on the Surface Roughness of Nanofilled Composite Resin: A Comparative in Vitro Study</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>553</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>558</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">114281</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22052/JNS.2023.02.025</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Tay</FirstName>
					<LastName>Hatem Kadhom</LastName>
<Affiliation>M.Sc. in conservative and aesthetic dentistry/Department of university healthcare /Al-Nahrain university, Iraq tayhatim212@gmail.com</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2023</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>05</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>This study aimed to assess and compare the surface roughness of nanofilled resin based composite (Filtek Z-350 XT) after using different finishing-polishing systems. sixty disk shaped samples were made from resin composite by using standardized cylindrical metal mold with measurements of 2 mm in thickness and 10 mm in diameter. The samples were randomly assigned to six experimental groups (number = 10): group 1 (transparent Mylar strip), group 2 (Sof-Lex discs), group 3 (Super-Snap discs), group 4 (OptiDisc discs), group 5 (Opti1Step polishers) and group 6 (OneGloss polishers). For each sample, the mean value of average surface roughness (Ra) was defined after three-times measurements using a profilometer. Depending on the results of ANOVA test, the surface roughness of the evaluated groups was in the following arrangement: transparent strip &lt; Super Snap discs &lt; OptiDisc discs &lt; Opti1Step polishers &lt; SofLex discs &lt; OneGloss polishers. The difference was statistically significant for composite surface roughness in the six study groups (P &lt; 5%). The surface finish of Filtek Z-350 XT nanofilled composite was found to be influenced by the following factors: composition of the finishing-polishing system used, number of polishing steps, in addition to the flexibility of the system during execution of finishing and polishing procedures.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Nanofilled composite</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Resin</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Surface roughness</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jns.kashanu.ac.ir/article_114281_2df88a37fe188c8196847c14252eee2e.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
